Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 20:16 +0000, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Remy Maucherat wrote: >>> On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 15:17 +0100, Rémy Maucherat wrote: >>>> The candidates binaries are available here: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.15/ >>>> >>>> According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is: >>>> [X] Broken >>>> [ ] Alpha >>>> [ ] Beta >>>> [ ] Stable >>> I am undecided about how to proceed with the release. The issues, >>> although visible, do not sound very serious in the real world, so it >>> would seem to be possible to release as stable. >> Just checking through the release, we still have a licensing issue so >> I >> don't believe we can proceed with the tag as is. See >> http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev&m=119170137616267&w=2 for details. >> >> Remy - you commmitted the files originally so you are the only one who >> can >> answer the question about their provenance. If the source was such >> that the >> Sun license can be removed, great. If not, we can use the CDDL ones. I >> am >> happy to make the changes myself but I need to know which way to go. > > These sources can be found in the specification documents. That doesn't mean we can just copy them.
> Geronimo > should also have the same files somewhere. I believe they use the CDDL ones but I'll check. I'll prepare a patch for 6.0.16 that uses whatever they use. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
