Tim Funk wrote:
But is name a string constant or is it built by using concatenation
(via reading XML via digester or other)? If its the latter, then name
is not a string constant.
that's a good point, one would expect most names to be pooled when it
comes to implicit class loading, although as you say, not a guarantee.
in findClassInternal, we do synchronized(this), so maybe we should not
need to introduce another locking object, when we already have the
instance itself.
Filip
-Tim
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
if String objects are kept in a constants pool, then one would
synchronized (name) {
clazz = super.findClass(name);
}
to allow concurrent loading of different classes,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
