Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > that's a good point, one would expect most names to be pooled when it > comes to implicit class loading, although as you say, not a guarantee. > in findClassInternal, we do synchronized(this), so maybe we should not > need to introduce another locking object, when we already have the > instance itself.
You are right. I was trying to be clever and failing miserably ;). I'll update the patch. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]