Remy Maucherat wrote: > On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 15:53 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote: >> It is in section 7.1.1 of the 3.0 early draft. It only applies to the >> cookie name. Making the url parameter configurable would be non-spec >> complaint but I don't see a good reason not to allow it if users have a >> requirement for it. > > For starters, I am not aware of such a draft document :( The draft is here: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315
I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken? > I think per context would be a big problem for proxies, so I am against > it. There's no need for a patch to state that, I think. Certainly, if they were looking at the cookie to manage load-balancing or similar then different values per context would make that configuration more complex than it needs to be. I would expect the few users that used this to set it on the default Manager but I don't see the harm in having the option to do it per context (with suitable warnings in the docs about proxies). Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
