On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>: > > > The candidates binaries are available here: > > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > > > > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > > [ ] Broken > > [ ] Alpha > > [ ] Beta > > > [x] Stable > > > > I do not see any issues with the release, except the one > of the tgz sources archive. > > Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: > The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip > archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. > > Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz.
Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives are supposed to be derivable from the source archives. See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what at the end of the section it says: "In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code release." This is not the case for the tgz archive. > I prepared such > an archive and placed it in > http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ > > md5 sum is > 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz > > > Best regards, > > Konstantin Kolinko > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
