On 25/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/5/24 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > > On 24/05/2009, Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/5/14 Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>: > >> > >> > The candidates binaries are available here: > >> > http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/ > >> > > >> > According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is: > >> > [ ] Broken > >> > [ ] Alpha > >> > [ ] Beta > >> > >> > [x] Stable > >> > > >> > >> I do not see any issues with the release, except the one > >> of the tgz sources archive. > >> > >> Regarding the tgz archive of the sources I propose the following: > >> The build was created on an Unix machine, so the files in the zip > >> archive are good enough to rerun the build on unixes. > >> > >> Thus, it is sufficient to repack the archive as tgz. > > > > Strictly speaking, it's not sufficient, because the binary archives > > are supposed to be derivable from the source archives. > > > > > It is source archive (-src.tar.gz) I am talking about. All binaries > are derivable from it.
Oops, sorry. > I do not see a contradiction here. Agreed. > It contains the same files as -src.zip. I used Apache Ant 1.7.0 to repack > these > sources (using the package-src-tgz target from dist.xml, but with fxcrlf > filter > removed). > > > > > See > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what > > > > at the end of the section it says: > > > > "In all such cases, the binary/bytecode package must have the same > > version number as the source release and may only add binary/bytecode > > files that are the result of compiling that version of the source code > > release." > > > > This is not the case for the tgz archive. > > > >> I prepared such > >> an archive and placed it in > >> http://people.apache.org/~kkolinko/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/src/ > >> > >> md5 sum is > >> 6a747d5bfa6b0b57605e8697ca8a4cae *apache-tomcat-6.0.20-src.tar.gz > >> > > > There are also the following options: > > 1. Rerun the build, but now with > LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1; export LANG; > before it. > > It will fix the UTF-8 issue with -src.tar.gz OK. > 2. Release as is. As Mark noted, 6.0.18 suffers from the same issue. > > I am OK with it. > I think it would be a bad idea to release 6.0.20 with the same fault. > > > Best regards, > Konstantin Kolinko > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
