And what is the problem you are trying to solve ? The old in-process' goal was speed - replacing marshalling with JNI. I don't think it gained much.
I think app isolation/chrooting and clean versioning/reload are great goals - but the model is one app per process. I fail to see use cases for having multiple webapps in different processes on same machine, still sharing directories. Is it to allow >4G heap ? 64bit VMs solve this. Scale ? Better done with more machines. Maybe too many cores ? Costin On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/11/2010 08:50 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > >> On 03/11/2010 08:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >>> On 03/11/2010 07:52 AM, Costin Manolache wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 03/10/2010 11:10 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You want to have each webapp served by a different process ? >>>>>> Or even different versions of a webapp in a different process ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> First goal is to get rid of connectors and use Tomcat >>>>> directly inside httpd or IIS or new Commons Runtime >>>>> (replacing Tomcat Native and Daemon) I'm working on. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> It used to work - about 10 years ago :-) >>>> >>>> >>> Actually didn't. It worked for IIS and Httpd on windows >>> only since at that time they had a single child process. >>> Now IIS is the same as httpd with worker mpm. >>> >>> That was on of the reasons we kill JK2. >>> JNI inproc connector simply didn't work. >>> >> >> One of the big problem is that the prefork and worker models may use >> several process for the same session and you can't fix a session to a >> JVM process... >> > > Sure. See the initial post. Session sharing is one > of the things that has to be done. > However this can be easily managed using shared memory > or even using memcached > > > > At the end you needed a flat cluster with one node for >> each process and that doesn't scale. >> >> > In essence it is a cluster, and that's why the subject title > is 'reusing instances' since it lives in the same directory. > > > Regards > -- > ^TM > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
