On 26/03/2012 09:20, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any deadline to add maven plugin part ?

The deadline is the end of this year. Sooner would be better.

> FYI on maven land we are working on solution to prevent manual svn operations.
> BTW if it's not ready I can push manual stuff.
> Can we think about having a test phase with the cms ?

Tomcat isn't planning on using the cms, just svnpubsub.

> (something like
> http;//tomcattest.apache.org similar to test we do in maven land with
> http://maventest.apache.org/)

If you do use the cms, you get a staging site you can use.

Mark

> 
> 
> 2012/3/25 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>> On 25/03/2012 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2012/3/26 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>>> On 25/03/2012 20:52, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>> Author: markt
>>>>> Date: Sun Mar 25 19:52:05 2012
>>>>> New Revision: 1305109
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305109&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Add Tomcat 3.2 docs
>>>>
>>>> This is the start of the process to move the Tomcat web site to
>>>> svnpubsub as mandated by the ASF infra team.
>>>>
>>>> Note that we could also move the site partially or fully to the CMS but
>>>> that is a bigger step and probably one we want to consider alongside the
>>>> discussions we have had around updating the overall style of the docs
>>>> and site.
>>>>
>>>> The first few steps will be to add files for the docs for the latest
>>>> versions of those components that are no longer supported.
>>>>
>>>> After that, I'll be checking in an updated build script that will allow
>>>> us to update the 5.5, 6.0 & 7.0 with minimal effort after a release.
>>>>
>>>> Then all add support for updating the native and jk docs.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, taglibs and the Maven plug-in will need to ensure that their
>>>> sites are svnpubsub compatible.
>>>>
>>>> The short version is that once the entire site is in svn, we can switch
>>>> to svnpubsub.
>>>>
>>>> The big advantage this will give us is the ability to make changes to
>>>> the site that appear on the live site in seconds rather than an hour or so.
>>>>
>>>
>>> A note:  using sparse checkout feature of svn is handy when dealing
>>> with the site.
>>> E.g. if you are in site/trunk then
>>>
>>> svn up --set-depth empty docs/tomcat-3.2-doc
>>>
>>> will pull in recently added  "tomcat-3.2-doc" subdirectory as empty
>>> one (instead of pulling the whole subtree as the usual "svn up" will
>>> do)
>>>
>>> The other subdirectories will be (looking at p.a.o):
>>>
>>> svn up --set-depth empty docs/tomcat-3.3-doc
>>> svn up --set-depth empty docs/tomcat-4.0-doc
>>> svn up --set-depth empty docs/tomcat-4.1-doc
>>>
>>>
>>> What about 5.5, 6.0, 7.0?
>>>
>>> If people use svn 1.7 clients  then I think it would be easier to
>>> commit them under their final names "tomcat-5.5-doc",
>>> "tomcat-6.0-doc", "tomcat-7.0-doc",   instead of the current symlink
>>> schema of "5.5 -> 5.5.35".
>>
>> Agreed. That is what I am planning to do.
>>
>>> With svn 1.7 there are no ".svn" subdirectories inside the tree,  so
>>> is is possible to rm the files from hard drive and replace them with
>>> new ones in place  before committing. (Some care will be needed for "!
>>> missing" and "? new" ones).
>>
>> That is what my modifications to the build script do but you are right
>> that they depend on the user to svn add / delete as required.
>>
>>> Regarding imported 3.2 docs:
>>> Some of them have unusual filenames (*.howto, faq) and thus did not
>>> have svn:eol-style applied.  I'll look at it ~tomorrow when Mark
>>> finishes the import.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> PS apologies for the svn commit deluge that is heading to the dev list.
>> The later the version, the bigger the docs.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to