Okay! This means its because of requirement specification of Tomcat.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Leon Rosenberg <rosenberg.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > maybe tomcat is just so robust, that nothing is fatal to it ;-) > Leon > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, sangeeta lal <sangeeta.6...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > Actually I have data for other log levels also. Debug =600 statements, > > error=400 statements, trace =90 statements etc. > > > > I am just curious, what could be the possible reason for having such few > > "fatal" statements. Can you give your opinion about this? > > > > Thanks! for reply. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > On 11/08/2014 09:14, sangeeta lal wrote: > > > > Hello Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sangeeta PhD scholar and Researcher working in the are of mining > > > > software repositories. > > > > > > > > Currently I am working on the *tomcat *platform. I am parsing the > code > > of > > > > tomcat (version 8) and I discovered that there are only *"10-11" > > > log.fatal > > > > statement.* > > > > > > > > I am just curious, is it normal? > > > > > > That depends on your definition of normal. > > > > > > > and why is it so? > > > > > > Because that this how the Tomcat developers wrote the code. > > > > > > > Why there so few*log.fatal *statements? > > > > > > That questions assumes that Tomcat has fewer than the normal number of > > > fatal log statements. As per my comment above, that depends on how > > > normal is defined. > > > > > > Mark > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards... > > Sangeeta > > Assistant Professor > > CSE Department @JIIT Noida > > > -- Regards... Sangeeta Assistant Professor CSE Department @JIIT Noida
