On 11/08/2014 10:41, sangeeta lal wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Actually I have data for other log levels also. Debug =600 statements, > error=400 statements, trace =90 statements etc. > > I am just curious, what could be the possible reason for having such few > "fatal" statements. Can you give your opinion about this?
You seem to be missing the point. Your claim that there are "too few" fatal statements is based on an assumption that there is a "correct" number of fatal statements. You have not provided any basis for your assumption of the correct number of log statements therefore it is impossible for anyone to explain why Tomcat has a different number. Mark > > Thanks! for reply. > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 11/08/2014 09:14, sangeeta lal wrote: >>> Hello Team, >>> >>> >>> I am sangeeta PhD scholar and Researcher working in the are of mining >>> software repositories. >>> >>> Currently I am working on the *tomcat *platform. I am parsing the code of >>> tomcat (version 8) and I discovered that there are only *"10-11" >> log.fatal >>> statement.* >>> >>> I am just curious, is it normal? >> >> That depends on your definition of normal. >> >>> and why is it so? >> >> Because that this how the Tomcat developers wrote the code. >> >>> Why there so few*log.fatal *statements? >> >> That questions assumes that Tomcat has fewer than the normal number of >> fatal log statements. As per my comment above, that depends on how >> normal is defined. >> >> Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
