No help yes. That is what we should target anyway. And removing a remote temp branch is not bad.
Mark got a good proposal with staging mirrors of main asf repos. Le 31 janv. 2015 13:22, "Thiago Veronezi" <thi...@veronezi.org> a écrit : > @Romain: if we are talking about temp remote branches, it implies later > removal of this branch [bad] otherwise we end up with dead branches [bad]. > If we are talking about local or remote branches that can be used by only > one person, it implies no help from the other developers [bad]. > > > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > @Thiago: not exactly since we do it in temp branches which could even be > > private > > Le 31 janv. 2015 10:32, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > > > > > > The "Apache Way” is not a set of rules. The Apache Way is > > > > > > > community over code. That’s it. Nothing else. > > > > > > > > > Alan, it is important but all that comes only _after_ some very basic > > > legal rules we have to follow. > > > Those are not many, but they exist. E.g. if a PMC doesn't like to > follow > > > the license and marks guidelines then it will simply get shut down by > > > board. And I'm glad that we don't have such issues at TomEE. > > > > > > > > > To understand the importance of code provenance you just need to look > at > > > the current subpoena we have to handle: > > > > > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_foundation_subpoenaed1 > > > > > > So it is really _very_ important for the foundation to have a very good > > > SCM history which can stand the proof of court! > > > > > > > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > >
