Sorry guys, still mobile. Defo + 1 to release asap. Even the noise will do
us good, and the 1.7.3 can follow just as quickly.

http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device.
On 20 Apr 2015 17:41, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'd say go without OpenJPA by using the our internal fork and do a 1.7.3
> when OpenJPA is available.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I would still like to be release manager for TomEE 1.7.2. I don't have a
> > strong preference on going ahead straight away or waiting for the OpenJPA
> > release. I'm equally happy to do a 1.7.3 release shortly after 1.7.2, no
> > problem. Romain has quite a strong view that the OpenJPA release really
> is
> > needed for this release.
> >
> > For reference, here's the original discussion:
> >
> > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/openjpa-patches-td4674131.html
> >
> > And the two JIRA issues:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511
> >
> > If anyone else has a view, please feel free to give it here, and then
> maybe
> > we can decide together to push forward, find another way to resolve these
> > issues, or roll this release with out these fixes, and roll another one
> > once they are available.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > Let's have the discussion in a different email.
> > > Jon did the first roll for 1.7.2 but it's been canceled because of a
> big
> > > issue.
> > >
> > > It's been a while and probably time to start again.
> > > There is an openjpa bug pending but I do agree with Andy, we should do
> > > anyway and release a 1.7.3 later.
> > >
> > > For years, we have been suffering of long release cycles not because
> PMCs
> > > are blocking but because we are always waiting for x y z to be fixed
> (x,
> > y,
> > > z being bugfixes, dep upgrade or whatever).
> > >
> > > We have Jon still happy to do the release 1.7.2 and Andy also happy to
> do
> > > it.
> > > As users are expecting a TomEE 2 for a while probably Andy you could
> > focus
> > > on doing a TomEE 2.x milestone?
> > > Needs another thread to discuss, but that's an idea.
> > > Another one would be to have you do the 1.7.3 when openjpa is fixed.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jonathan Gallimore
> > http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
>

Reply via email to