The OpenJPA vote has passed. I have updated the 1.7.x branch to use OpenJPA 2.4, and it is looking good. I'll start the release process started.
Thanks Jon On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jgallim...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Agreed - as this is in progress (thanks Mark!) I think we should wait it > out - if it passes, that's great. If not, we can discuss what plan 'B' > might be. > > Jon > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > >> +! >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Andy Gumbrecht < >> agumbre...@tomitribe.com> >> wrote: >> >> > If the vote passes then all is good, I guess this discussion is a ' >> just in >> > case' track. >> > >> > http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device. >> > On 20 Apr 2015 20:08, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> > >> > > openjpa VOTE is on the way… >> > > >> > > LieGrue, >> > > strub >> > > >> > > >> > > > Am 20.04.2015 um 18:11 schrieb Andy Gumbrecht < >> > agumbre...@tomitribe.com >> > > >: >> > > > >> > > > Sorry guys, still mobile. Defo + 1 to release asap. Even the noise >> will >> > > do >> > > > us good, and the 1.7.3 can follow just as quickly. >> > > > >> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com - @AndyGeeDe - On a small screen device. >> > > > On 20 Apr 2015 17:41, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" < >> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> I'd say go without OpenJPA by using the our internal fork and do a >> > 1.7.3 >> > > >> when OpenJPA is available. >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >> >> > > >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < >> > > >> jgallim...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> Hi >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I would still like to be release manager for TomEE 1.7.2. I don't >> > have >> > > a >> > > >>> strong preference on going ahead straight away or waiting for the >> > > OpenJPA >> > > >>> release. I'm equally happy to do a 1.7.3 release shortly after >> 1.7.2, >> > > no >> > > >>> problem. Romain has quite a strong view that the OpenJPA release >> > really >> > > >> is >> > > >>> needed for this release. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> For reference, here's the original discussion: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/openjpa-patches-td4674131.html >> > > >>> >> > > >>> And the two JIRA issues: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2573 >> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2511 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> If anyone else has a view, please feel free to give it here, and >> then >> > > >> maybe >> > > >>> we can decide together to push forward, find another way to >> resolve >> > > these >> > > >>> issues, or roll this release with out these fixes, and roll >> another >> > one >> > > >>> once they are available. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Jon >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> > > >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Hi guys, >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Let's have the discussion in a different email. >> > > >>>> Jon did the first roll for 1.7.2 but it's been canceled because >> of a >> > > >> big >> > > >>>> issue. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> It's been a while and probably time to start again. >> > > >>>> There is an openjpa bug pending but I do agree with Andy, we >> should >> > do >> > > >>>> anyway and release a 1.7.3 later. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> For years, we have been suffering of long release cycles not >> because >> > > >> PMCs >> > > >>>> are blocking but because we are always waiting for x y z to be >> fixed >> > > >> (x, >> > > >>> y, >> > > >>>> z being bugfixes, dep upgrade or whatever). >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> We have Jon still happy to do the release 1.7.2 and Andy also >> happy >> > to >> > > >> do >> > > >>>> it. >> > > >>>> As users are expecting a TomEE 2 for a while probably Andy you >> could >> > > >>> focus >> > > >>>> on doing a TomEE 2.x milestone? >> > > >>>> Needs another thread to discuss, but that's an idea. >> > > >>>> Another one would be to have you do the 1.7.3 when openjpa is >> fixed. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> -- >> > > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >>>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -- >> > > >>> Jonathan Gallimore >> > > >>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore >> > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Jonathan Gallimore > http://twitter.com/jongallimore > http://www.tomitribe.com > -- Jonathan Gallimore http://twitter.com/jongallimore http://www.tomitribe.com
