Should be able - if it can wait on monday cause im on the phone ATM. Just
comment it for now to say your work on it.
Le 1 août 2015 22:38, "Alex Gout" <agg...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Thanks Romain. Are you able to assign 1618 to me? Or any other one you
> think I could pick up
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:35 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sure. Take a task. One thing I love in openejb is speaking of feature and
> > not technology first. Makes clearly more added value to end users.
> >
> > Grab a task, do it the best you can and you will always get support for
> it
> > if you need :).
> > Le 1 août 2015 21:36, "Alex Gout" <agg...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > I just wanted to contribute to (what I thought was) a nice project.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:25 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ok so let speak on real use cases for now.
> > > >
> > > > I didnt speak of anything theorical just than mocking means missing
> > sthg
> > > > and with tomee you never need it so better to not start by it.
> > > > Le 1 août 2015 21:07, "Alex Gout" <agg...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your comment. However, I'm still not certain what type
> of
> > > > > testing you are talking about. For integration test, you are
> > absolutely
> > > > > right. However, integration tests only don't cut it if you want to
> > > really
> > > > > test your product and its components. You can find numerous sites
> > where
> > > > you
> > > > > can read about the importance of unit tests.
> > > > > You don't always need mocks or stubs when writing unit tests, but
> > > > sometimes
> > > > > they will break a dependency you're not interested in for the test
> at
> > > > hand
> > > > > and you just want to mock or stub expected behaviour of that
> > > dependency,
> > > > > UNLIKE you would do in an integration test which I think is your
> main
> > > > > concern.
> > > > > I don't have an example at the moment, I was just curious because I
> > > don't
> > > > > see many unit tests using mocks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:28 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dont want to debate here but mocking internals is not really
> > testing
> > > -
> > > > it
> > > > > > is ok for external systems cause you dont have the choice most of
> > the
> > > > > time.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you want to mock? Maybe it would be easier this way.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le 1 août 2015 17:11, "Alex Gout" <agg...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I can only assume you're talking about integration testing in
> > which
> > > > > case
> > > > > > > you shouldn't use mocks (maybe stubs in some cases for example
> > when
> > > > > > relying
> > > > > > > on 3rd party services). However, for solid unit testing using
> > mocks
> > > > is
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > avoidable.
> > > > > > > Your side note illustrates why unit tests are so important.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le 1 août 2015 03:30, "Alex Gout" <agg...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I created JIRA TOMEE-1618. Can someone check and assign to
> me
> > > > > please?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Also a question.. I don't see many unit tests that use
> mocks,
> > > > only
> > > > > a
> > > > > > few
> > > > > > > > > that use easymock. Is it a problem to introduce Mockito?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why mocking? Just really test :p. Whell behind the joke the
> > > reality
> > > > > is
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > mocked test doesnt gives you any guarantee so for me it is
> like
> > > not
> > > > > > testing
> > > > > > > > anything - sadly speaking from experience.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Side note: arquillian and mvn modules can have additional
> > tests.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to