Geronimo connector already does that with its connections proxying. There
is a phantom tracker IIRC.
Do you know in which case we would leak connections? Last time I checked it
was only possible if missing a close which is a programming miss. Is that
the case we want to deal with?
Le 18 nov. 2015 04:32, "agumbrecht" <agumbre...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> This seems to be the best candidate location to wrap the ConnectionFactory:
>
> org/apache/openejb/InjectionProcessor.java:243
>
> Adding if(ConnectionFactory.class.isInstance(value)){value = ..wrapper..}
> would work here.
>
> However, is there a way to 'event' the wrapping without too much overhead?
> -
> I'm thinking of a more general way of saying - hey pre-injection event
> listener here is an object value I am about to inject into this class, do
> you want to wrap it first.
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht
>
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> agumbre...@tomitribe.com
> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-connection-wrapper-tp4676832p4676834.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
