dont get me wrong: I'm happy if anything is done on the remote resources
plugin to make it better (and I love the "more usable" idea and the
standard format). I'm just unhappy we say it is too hard to have 3 versions
depending the distribution.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-12-01 17:03 GMT+01:00 Andy Gumbrecht <agumbre...@tomitribe.com>:

> Ah OK, now I get how you are thinking about this.
>
> I did not know users use the individual notice and license files to
> catalogue distribution contents. In that case we should create some kind of
> standard order and format in these files to make that easier for those
> users, and potentially make it better for the project.
>
> And when you say I said that webprofile depends on activemq you are not
> accurate in saying that, because I did not (you did). Maybe something to
> think about? Probably not.
>
> We'll just keep it the way it is then. :-X
>
> On 01/12/2015 16:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> when you say webprofile depends on activemq you are not accurate and can
>> trigger ambiguity and work for end users (security etc) which shouldnt
>> even
>> be thought about.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-12-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy <andy...@gmx.de>:
>>
>> It has nothing to do with being lazy, rather efficient.
>>> In what way exactly is one 7kb file compared to eighteen noisy?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2015 15:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> 2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <andy...@gmx.de>:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE
>>>> has
>>>>
>>>>> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
>>>>> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>>>>>
>>>>> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part
>>>>> of
>>>>> a
>>>>> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and
>>>>> bad
>>>>>
>>>> information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>>>>
>>>>> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should
>>>>>
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> responsible of it already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <asot...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by
>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>>>>>> jars
>>>>>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> current setup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <andy...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>       ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>>       ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       This product includes software developed by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Please read the different LICENSE files present in the
>>>>>>>>> licenses
>>>>>>>>> directory of
>>>>>>>>>       this distribution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>      Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>      https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

Reply via email to