On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hmm, interesting. Reworking the website I ensured to avoid JavaEE (BTW JEE
> doesnt exist anymore ;)) cause it is not important at tomee level. I mean
> if tomee covers JavaEE then it reduces mathematically tomee specific
> features space which is what users search coming on tomee website in
> general.
>
> The classloader point is funny but part of the most hit issue so don't know
> if hiding it a bit would be beneficial. The website has been thought as an
> enabler/reference and less like a book with a progression ('getting
> started"s probably) which is more or less what you propose. Wonder if we
> can merge both somehow, probably with the new menu item.
>
> I like your menu but it can need a submenu on doc - not sure how mobile
> handling would be but doable.
>
> Maybe we should drop the blog, we never used it accurately.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
>
> 2017-06-26 0:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Whitmore <[email protected]
> >:
>
> > Hi Ivan, Romain,
> >
> > I probably support having a 'Documentation' item in the top menu.  At the
> > moment there are all the subtopics, but nothing at the top-level says
> > Documentation!  At a brief glance this is likely to give the impression
> > that there isn't documentation, or that it's hard to find.
> >
> > From an external perspective 'Documentation', 'Getting Started' and
> > possibly 'Examples' are good top-level headings.
> >
> > I would suggest something like:
> > - Documentation
> > - Getting Starting
> > - Examples
> > - Blog
> > - Community
> > - Downloads
> >
> > I write quite a lot of documentation so my quick thoughts -- trying to be
> > constructive here.
> >
> > Reviewing the current 'Developer', 'Admin', 'Advanced' pages -- these are
> > all lacking any overview to tell you the basics and badly empty.
> > There needs to be some introductory text to start these sections and set
> > the scene,  TomEE for Developers needs to start with an overview of what
> > TomEE is & why it's good;  then have some simple guide or guides to
> writing
> > JEE application, as the first (few) articles. These will show how to use
> > TomEE's features.
> >
> > 'Developer' section should go something like:
> > - (introductory text)  TomEE is a JEE container. Advantages this gives.
> > - JEE Basics  -- basic outlines of how to write a JEE application & link
> > to other guides
> > - Eclipse, Intellij Idea, Netbeans: TomEE in and IDE   (maybe:  but
> > there's no real content here)
> > - JEE Feature Guides
> > - TomEE and Testing
> >
> > Perhaps there could be several guides to important JEE areas:
> > - JEE Guide -- CDI
> > - JEE Guide -- Datasource
> > - JEE Guide -- JPA
> > - JEE Guide -- EJB
> > - JEE Guide -- CXF & Webservices
> >
> > The above topics map well to the areas in Examples
> > http://tomee.apache.org/examples/index-ng.html which have good coverage
> > of examples.. and outlining a little bit of concrete usage should allow
> > good opportunities to explain TomEE's configuration, particular details
> etc.
> >
> > (Little bit of an insight here -- perhaps the fact that we haven't been
> > focusing / docing based on the JEE features, has made it hard to write
> doc?)
> >
> > I suggest 'Developer' section should not start with "All you need to know
> > about TomEE classloading". This is not what new developer should need to
> > get started with, and is a great way to scare people off.
> >
> > Busy these past couple of months, trying to offer some guidance to the
> > best degree I can but don't have time available to actually do the
> writing.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Thomas
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
>

Reply via email to