PS - cause it appeared unobvious on jira: we should try to keep current
bookmarks as much as possible cause users already complained we changed
them and it is now "done" (= we dont get complains anymore or very rarely)
so i don't feel comfortable breaking it again


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-06-26 12:48 GMT+02:00 Ivan Junckes Filho <[email protected]>:

> Thanks Romain will work on this.
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > 2017-06-26 12:43 GMT+02:00 Ivan Junckes Filho <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Hi guys, if you agree with Thomas menu I can try to work on the change
> > and
> > > make the "sub-menus" like sections in the page so sub-menus wouldn't be
> > > necessary.
> > >
> > > What do you think Romain?
> > >
> >
> > sub menus are needed to ensure the navigation is smooth and not enforced
> > some pages (reduce the number of *clicks* ;) - hover is fine).
> >
> > +1 to modify the menu while it works on desktop and mobile.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hmm, interesting. Reworking the website I ensured to avoid JavaEE
> (BTW
> > > JEE
> > > >> doesnt exist anymore ;)) cause it is not important at tomee level. I
> > > mean
> > > >> if tomee covers JavaEE then it reduces mathematically tomee specific
> > > >> features space which is what users search coming on tomee website in
> > > >> general.
> > > >>
> > > >> The classloader point is funny but part of the most hit issue so
> don't
> > > >> know
> > > >> if hiding it a bit would be beneficial. The website has been thought
> > as
> > > an
> > > >> enabler/reference and less like a book with a progression ('getting
> > > >> started"s probably) which is more or less what you propose. Wonder
> if
> > we
> > > >> can merge both somehow, probably with the new menu item.
> > > >>
> > > >> I like your menu but it can need a submenu on doc - not sure how
> > mobile
> > > >> handling would be but doable.
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe we should drop the blog, we never used it accurately.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> > > >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2017-06-26 0:40 GMT+02:00 Thomas Whitmore
> <twhitmore@bravurasolutions.
> > > com
> > > >> >:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Ivan, Romain,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I probably support having a 'Documentation' item in the top menu.
> > At
> > > >> the
> > > >> > moment there are all the subtopics, but nothing at the top-level
> > says
> > > >> > Documentation!  At a brief glance this is likely to give the
> > > impression
> > > >> > that there isn't documentation, or that it's hard to find.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > From an external perspective 'Documentation', 'Getting Started'
> and
> > > >> > possibly 'Examples' are good top-level headings.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would suggest something like:
> > > >> > - Documentation
> > > >> > - Getting Starting
> > > >> > - Examples
> > > >> > - Blog
> > > >> > - Community
> > > >> > - Downloads
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I write quite a lot of documentation so my quick thoughts --
> trying
> > to
> > > >> be
> > > >> > constructive here.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Reviewing the current 'Developer', 'Admin', 'Advanced' pages --
> > these
> > > >> are
> > > >> > all lacking any overview to tell you the basics and badly empty.
> > > >> > There needs to be some introductory text to start these sections
> and
> > > set
> > > >> > the scene,  TomEE for Developers needs to start with an overview
> of
> > > what
> > > >> > TomEE is & why it's good;  then have some simple guide or guides
> to
> > > >> writing
> > > >> > JEE application, as the first (few) articles. These will show how
> to
> > > use
> > > >> > TomEE's features.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 'Developer' section should go something like:
> > > >> > - (introductory text)  TomEE is a JEE container. Advantages this
> > > gives.
> > > >> > - JEE Basics  -- basic outlines of how to write a JEE application
> &
> > > link
> > > >> > to other guides
> > > >> > - Eclipse, Intellij Idea, Netbeans: TomEE in and IDE   (maybe:
> but
> > > >> > there's no real content here)
> > > >> > - JEE Feature Guides
> > > >> > - TomEE and Testing
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Perhaps there could be several guides to important JEE areas:
> > > >> > - JEE Guide -- CDI
> > > >> > - JEE Guide -- Datasource
> > > >> > - JEE Guide -- JPA
> > > >> > - JEE Guide -- EJB
> > > >> > - JEE Guide -- CXF & Webservices
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The above topics map well to the areas in Examples
> > > >> > http://tomee.apache.org/examples/index-ng.html which have good
> > > coverage
> > > >> > of examples.. and outlining a little bit of concrete usage should
> > > allow
> > > >> > good opportunities to explain TomEE's configuration, particular
> > > details
> > > >> etc.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > (Little bit of an insight here -- perhaps the fact that we haven't
> > > been
> > > >> > focusing / docing based on the JEE features, has made it hard to
> > write
> > > >> doc?)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I suggest 'Developer' section should not start with "All you need
> to
> > > >> know
> > > >> > about TomEE classloading". This is not what new developer should
> > need
> > > to
> > > >> > get started with, and is a great way to scare people off.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Busy these past couple of months, trying to offer some guidance to
> > the
> > > >> > best degree I can but don't have time available to actually do the
> > > >> writing.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> > Thomas
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ____________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > >> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> > > >> service.
> > > >> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> > > >> > ____________________________________________________________
> > > __________
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to