Hi Ivan!

Thanks for the links. My personal view - I prefer the documentation link,
but I do like the split of the documentation page into groups. The
advantage here as I see it is all the documentation is linked in one place
- no need to go into 'Developer' and realize its not there, and then check
'Admin'.

I also wonder if we should also post this to the users@ list to see if
there are any preferences there?

I understand Romain's points about the 404 (see the PR comments) - a
potential compromise there is for the admin and developer links to forward
onto the documentation page with a note saying its moved and "please update
your bookmarks". We'll inevitably want to move content around and/or change
the structure over time. Some sort of graceful way of doing that like I
described might be good pattern to follow.

Thanks for taking the time to hack on this and present it to the community!

Jon

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Ivan Junckes Filho <[email protected]>
wrote:

> (Please disregard the previous email, pressed enter by mistake)
>
> Hi guys, thank you for the feedback on this. The intention of the
> "Documentation" was to let the user know exactly where what he is looking
> for is. The content inside is not perfect, but we are getting better.
>
> The links for the changes made are below, please give feedback on them.
>
> Pull Request:
> https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/1
>
> Website for review:
> https://ivanjunckes.github.io/
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Ivan Junckes Filho <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys, thank you for the feedback on this. The intention of the
> > "Documentation" was to let the user know exactly where what he is looking
> > for is. The content inside is not perfect, but we are getting better.
> >
> > Here are all the changes made
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ok, saw Andy did a similar comment on github so probably let's reverse
> the
> >> question.
> >>
> >> Anyone feeling like me it is a passthrough? (if not under 1 day think we
> >> can "close it" and just push it in prod)
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>
> >> 2017-07-06 0:48 GMT+02:00 Thomas Whitmore <twhitmore@bravurasolutions.
> com
> >> >:
> >>
> >> > For me the Documentation menu item is very good;  it shows at the top
> >> > level that the TomEE project has documentation.
> >> > Also like the content of the Documentation page, it hits 'How to
> >> > Configure',  'IDEs' and 'Testing' upfront & early which should give a
> >> good
> >> > impression on people considering uptake of the project -- as well as
> not
> >> > looking so terribly empty.
> >> >
> >> > +1 on both fronts.
> >> >
> >> > Search can be an additional feature but for me getting the static text
> >> > structure OK is paramount. I think Ivan has made very good improvement
> >> on
> >> > that.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> > Sent: Thursday, 6 July 2017 9:09 AM
> >> > To: [email protected]
> >> > Subject: Re: Site and "documentation" usage
> >> >
> >> > very close http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/ivan/ can be used
> >> (think
> >> > Ivan did some minor adjustments after but overall idea is here if I'm
> >> not
> >> > mistaken)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog <
> >> > https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <
> >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau>
> >> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE
> Factory <
> >> > https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >> >
> >> > 2017-07-05 23:03 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> > [email protected]>
> >> > :
> >> >
> >> > > Ivan - did you have some luck getting that staged somewhere? I'd
> love
> >> > > to take a look and give some feedback.
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers
> >> > >
> >> > > Jon
> >> >
> >> > ____________________________________________________________
> __________
> >> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> >> service.
> >> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >> > ____________________________________________________________
> __________
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to