Yep - that's what I had in my mind. Makes sense if a comparator is specified, we should use that instead of the @Priority ordering.
Jon On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > What's do we want to do? Looks like a EE 8 feature we can eagerly support > as a default comparator (if the comparator is set we must bypass it to > respect the comparator IMHO) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2017-07-25 17:03 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > : > > > I'm happy to take a look at this one, unless someone else is already > > working on it? > > > > Jon > > >
