Hmm, I don't get the rational of having a 7.x with that. Any reason? Technically TomEE 8 is way more ready to release than TomEE 7.1 ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-04-19 12:00 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> : > Right now we have JL's change in master as well as TomEE 8. I'm happy to > try and find time to release both. However, I think we're inching very > close with TomEE 7.0.5, so does anyone mind if I create the 7.1 branch, and > shift JL's JWT work there, and take it out of master (7.0.5)? > > Jon > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > > > wrote: > > > Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is > cool. > > And I fully support that. > > But right now let's please focus on shipping TomEE-7.0.5 first. > > Most probably 7.1 could be done almost in parallel. > > But we do not have endless resources. At least I don't. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > Am 19.04.2018 um 05:25 schrieb David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > > > >> On Apr 18, 2018, at 4:08 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID > > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago where we agreed to > > ship TomEE-7.0.5 and only then switch to a branch. > > >> > > >> That's the reason why we backported tons of stuff in Johnzon, OWB and > > OpenJPA. > > >> Just waiting for feedback whether it now works fine or if there is > > still something broken. > > >> > > >> So my suggestion is to apply this to the TomEE8 branch and wait with > > the other PR until TomEE-7.0.5 is released. > > > > > > Kicked off a proper "Status of TomEE 8" thread so we can have a full > > conversation on what to do with TomEE 8. > > > > > > If people were willing to put the effort into a TomEE 7.1 in addition > to > > whatever is decided in that thread, would you be ok with a TomEE 7.1 as > > well? > > > > > > For context: I know Jean-Louis is heading off to Brazil in May to do a > > TomEE talk that shows his JWT work. Ideally he's not showing a snapshot > > and people could leave with something they can try. He's doing that talk > > again in June. > > > > > > My personal perspective is if the decision was made to release TomEE 8 > > now, I'd still see value in a 7.1 release with MicroProfile as then the > > users would have the choice. Some may not want to do a Java EE 7 to Java > > EE 8 upgrade, but still want to enjoy some MicroProfile technologies. > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > >