Hi all, I have reworked the PR and started creating an example based on the movie one. The wiring is done, I need to create a login page so I can generate a token and then pass the token on REST calls. If anyone wants to help (my JS skills aren't very good).
The PR is against TomEE 8.x branch. https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/130 If you want to review, or try, that'd be more than welcome. In terms of what I need for next month, a TomEE 8.x release (even a beta) would be great so people can leave the conference and give it a try. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > The minor bump to 7.1 is mainly for java8 not for mp. > And of course that might affect users rather heavily. > There are still companies which are on Java7 – they should be aware. > > Lg, > Strub > > > Am 19.04.2018 um 21:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] > >: > > > > Le 19 avr. 2018 20:47, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > > Heh that was nicely put and I do certainly agree with your finding ;) > > > > @Romain, the 7.1 was just 7.0.x + java8 bump and MP. > > > > > > I got that but not its need. > > > > > > Of course I have no clue who will use EE7 with MP, if he can have EE8 as > > well... > > All I wanted is to make a clear disctinction between TomEE with Java7 and > > TomEE which requires Java8 - thus the required bump to 7.1.x. > > > > > > Hmm, technically we know how to do a 7.0 with a mp distro (all but mp on > > java 7). > > > > > > Im not against a 7.1 but if it only brings 10% of a MP distro im not > > convinced it is wise to do it. Writing I even wonder if MP justifies a > > minor bump. > > > > Our online versioning policy references minor as a feature level marker. > MP > > distro doesnt bring any feature to most tomee users - as well as just a > > java min version bump - so arent we too enthusiast here? > > > > The important thing to keep in mind is users, not tech choices. > > > > Just my 2cts indeed > > > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > >> Am 19.04.2018 um 13:23 schrieb Rudy De Busscher <[email protected] > >: > >> > >> If needed, I can lend a hand in updating TomEE 7.1 > >> > >> But I agree, certification becomes less an issue.I have the impression > >> that even Big vendors don't set it as a priority. > >> > >> Rudy > >> > >> On 19 April 2018 at 11:24, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >>> Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is > > cool. > >>> And I fully support that. > >>> But right now let's please focus on shipping TomEE-7.0.5 first. > >>> Most probably 7.1 could be done almost in parallel. > >>> But we do not have endless resources. At least I don't. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>>> Am 19.04.2018 um 05:25 schrieb David Blevins <[email protected] > >: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Apr 18, 2018, at 4:08 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago where we agreed to > >>> ship TomEE-7.0.5 and only then switch to a branch. > >>>>> > >>>>> That's the reason why we backported tons of stuff in Johnzon, OWB and > >>> OpenJPA. > >>>>> Just waiting for feedback whether it now works fine or if there is > >>> still something broken. > >>>>> > >>>>> So my suggestion is to apply this to the TomEE8 branch and wait with > >>> the other PR until TomEE-7.0.5 is released. > >>>> > >>>> Kicked off a proper "Status of TomEE 8" thread so we can have a full > >>> conversation on what to do with TomEE 8. > >>>> > >>>> If people were willing to put the effort into a TomEE 7.1 in addition > to > >>> whatever is decided in that thread, would you be ok with a TomEE 7.1 as > >>> well? > >>>> > >>>> For context: I know Jean-Louis is heading off to Brazil in May to do a > >>> TomEE talk that shows his JWT work. Ideally he's not showing a > snapshot > >>> and people could leave with something they can try. He's doing that > talk > >>> again in June. > >>>> > >>>> My personal perspective is if the decision was made to release TomEE 8 > >>> now, I'd still see value in a 7.1 release with MicroProfile as then the > >>> users would have the choice. Some may not want to do a Java EE 7 to > Java > >>> EE 8 upgrade, but still want to enjoy some MicroProfile technologies. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >
