Folks, can we FIRST focus on getting TomEE-7.0.5 done?
We agreed that we FIRST do 7.0.5, and only THEN ship TomEE-7.1 in a branch and
move TomEE8 to master.
I've now released OWB-1.7.5, next up is Johnzon-1.0.1.
Are all the fixes for Johnzon already applied and all the patches shipped? I've
not seen them yet. And Romain and I cannot do all the work alone. Or rather it
will take a bit time then.
And the last puzzle part is OpenJPA-2.4.3 and 3.0.0.
So please less talking, more hacking.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
On Wednesday, 2 May 2018, 07:07:54 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Just take this one:
"
Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is cool.
And I fully support that.
"
Not at all "I fully support TomEE 7.1 for MP".
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against 7.1, I even proposed something very
closed months ago (before we got the 8 branch) but I'm against creating a
branch and play with the versioning policy until we can justify it by
something affecting users+being justified technically.
I don't think we got here yet.
Take it as "how would it affect users?"+"how does it affects us?". First
answer is clearly "no impact" - we are already in prod with j8 - and last
one is pretty much the same technically AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
2018-05-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>:
> Could I ask for an off-topic personal favor? Sometimes your email replies
> come with no quoting at all and the only way to find your words is to read
> both the old and new emails and do a mental diff.
>
> I've been tested a few times for dyslexia and don't have it, but my
> reading speed is very impaired regardless. If you can help me by taking
> care to ensure there is proper quoting, I'd be deeply appreciative.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> > On May 1, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Le 1 mai 2018 23:08, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> > We can certainly continue discussing, but there have been 7.1 discussions
> > including people like Rudy, Jean-Louis and Jonathan volunteering on list
> to
> > work on a 7.1. Mark raising some questions and chiming in with "I fully
> > support that."
> >
> >
> > This is likely reading only the part you wanted ;). Mark always put some
> > conditions to that, JL doesnt care much from what i read and to play the
> > same "finger in the wind" game I think Rudy - correct me if Im wrong -
> > would support any technical solution leading to a mp distro.
> >
> >
> > This is finger-in-the-wind observation of positive response and certainly
> > there is still room for other feedback.
> >
> > What would you recommend we do from here?
> >
> >
> > First we need to clearly state what is the difference between a 7.1 and
> 8.
> > All i read was a half baked 8 (so 8 from our last months discussions) or
> a
> > 7+mp which doesnt work if we want to do a 7+some ee 8. MP not driving
> tomee
> > by design (and it is good), it shouldnt imply any versioning to stay
> > consistent for end users.
> >
> > Technically we can do a mp distro on tomee 7.0 (using toolchain) and/or
> > tomee 8.0 (natively).
> >
> > Keep in mind it is as minor for the project as the plume distro - we can
> > even do a "all permutations distro" update on 7.0 and 8.0. It is far to
> > modify the project nature, goal or codebase.
> >
> > Once we know what we want to bring then we can go through the standard
> > process of a vote if people disagree or just move forward.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Blevins
> > http://twitter.com/dblevins
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >> On May 1, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Which leads to the same David, no?
> >> There is no decision taken and no real argument - before your mail -
> for a
> >> 7.1.
> >> Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better
> handle
> >> thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and acts
> > are
> >> not consistent :(.
> >>
> >> Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> >>
> >> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were willing
> to
> >> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a
> > problem.
> >>
> >> Note, just got off the MicroProfile hangout and there we've proposed to
> >> doing both a MicroProfile 1.4 and MicroProfile 2.0 release on June 6th.
> >> The release contents would be the same with the exception of the minimum
> >> Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 will
> be
> >> Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x afterwards,
> >> though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component specs
> >> want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE
> > dependency
> >> at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams:
> >>
> >> - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1)
> >> - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Blevins
> >> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread have
> >>> been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> >> rmannibucau> |
> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> >> ee-8-high-performance>
> >>>
> >>> 2018-04-30 16:34 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
> >> :
> >>>
> >>>> Hi community,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE 7.0.x) as
> >>>> discussed a while back.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch.
> >>>> The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/tomee/tree/microprofile_
> >> backport
> >>>> I have pushed what I have currently in there. I'll need to test more
> >>>> deeply.
> >>>>
> >>>> JLouis
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>
>
>
