I took the approach Romain suggested, but I completely agree with the JIRA for release notes, so I'll get those sorted out. Thanks Mark!
Jon On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > Hell yes, this damn GitHub PRs. Totally splits the communities. > Either it spams us or we loose information :( > > I'm all for keeping our stuff on JIRA and our own mailing lists. > > Will look at it and apply it. > We need JIRA tickets nonetheless. Otherwise we cannot craft any release > notes. > > What I did for OWB-1.7.5 is to just add this version to the original > tickets. > So if you only backported existing JIRA tickets, then please do me a > favour and add the 1.0.1 version to them. > > txs and LieGure, > strub > > > Am 04.05.2018 um 12:02 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>: > > > > Here's the PR for reference: https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/21 > > > > Romain gave it a thumbs-up. I'll try and get those JIRA references today. > > > > Jon > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I submitted a PR for Johnzon, and owe some JIRA references. I don't > think > >> it has been merged yet. I'm definitely not expecting you or Romain to do > >> the work alone. Thanks for the OWB releases! > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Mark Struberg > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Folks, can we FIRST focus on getting TomEE-7.0.5 done? > >>> > >>> We agreed that we FIRST do 7.0.5, and only THEN ship TomEE-7.1 in a > >>> branch and move TomEE8 to master. > >>> > >>> I've now released OWB-1.7.5, next up is Johnzon-1.0.1. > >>> Are all the fixes for Johnzon already applied and all the patches > >>> shipped? I've not seen them yet. And Romain and I cannot do all the > work > >>> alone. Or rather it will take a bit time then. > >>> And the last puzzle part is OpenJPA-2.4.3 and 3.0.0. > >>> > >>> So please less talking, more hacking. > >>> > >>> txs and LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wednesday, 2 May 2018, 07:07:54 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Just take this one: > >>> > >>> " > >>> Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is > cool. > >>> And I fully support that. > >>> " > >>> > >>> Not at all "I fully support TomEE 7.1 for MP". > >>> > >>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not against 7.1, I even proposed something very > >>> closed months ago (before we got the 8 branch) but I'm against > creating a > >>> branch and play with the versioning policy until we can justify it by > >>> something affecting users+being justified technically. > >>> I don't think we got here yet. > >>> Take it as "how would it affect users?"+"how does it affects us?". > First > >>> answer is clearly "no impact" - we are already in prod with j8 - and > last > >>> one is pretty much the same technically AFAIK. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8- > >>> high-performance> > >>> > >>> 2018-05-02 0:42 GMT+02:00 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> Could I ask for an off-topic personal favor? Sometimes your email > >>> replies > >>>> come with no quoting at all and the only way to find your words is to > >>> read > >>>> both the old and new emails and do a mental diff. > >>>> > >>>> I've been tested a few times for dyslexia and don't have it, but my > >>>> reading speed is very impaired regardless. If you can help me by > taking > >>>> care to ensure there is proper quoting, I'd be deeply appreciative. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> David Blevins > >>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>>>> On May 1, 2018, at 2:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Le 1 mai 2018 23:08, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > >>> écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> We can certainly continue discussing, but there have been 7.1 > >>> discussions > >>>>> including people like Rudy, Jean-Louis and Jonathan volunteering on > >>> list > >>>> to > >>>>> work on a 7.1. Mark raising some questions and chiming in with "I > >>> fully > >>>>> support that." > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> This is likely reading only the part you wanted ;). Mark always put > >>> some > >>>>> conditions to that, JL doesnt care much from what i read and to play > >>> the > >>>>> same "finger in the wind" game I think Rudy - correct me if Im wrong > - > >>>>> would support any technical solution leading to a mp distro. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> This is finger-in-the-wind observation of positive response and > >>> certainly > >>>>> there is still room for other feedback. > >>>>> > >>>>> What would you recommend we do from here? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> First we need to clearly state what is the difference between a 7.1 > >>> and > >>>> 8. > >>>>> All i read was a half baked 8 (so 8 from our last months discussions) > >>> or > >>>> a > >>>>> 7+mp which doesnt work if we want to do a 7+some ee 8. MP not driving > >>>> tomee > >>>>> by design (and it is good), it shouldnt imply any versioning to stay > >>>>> consistent for end users. > >>>>> > >>>>> Technically we can do a mp distro on tomee 7.0 (using toolchain) > >>> and/or > >>>>> tomee 8.0 (natively). > >>>>> > >>>>> Keep in mind it is as minor for the project as the plume distro - we > >>> can > >>>>> even do a "all permutations distro" update on 7.0 and 8.0. It is far > >>> to > >>>>> modify the project nature, goal or codebase. > >>>>> > >>>>> Once we know what we want to bring then we can go through the > standard > >>>>> process of a vote if people disagree or just move forward. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> David Blevins > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> On May 1, 2018, at 1:04 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Which leads to the same David, no? > >>>>>> There is no decision taken and no real argument - before your mail - > >>>> for a > >>>>>> 7.1. > >>>>>> Either there are too much off list discussions or we should better > >>>> handle > >>>>>> thread outcomes cause ATM, if you follow the list, discussions and > >>> acts > >>>>> are > >>>>>> not consistent :(. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 1 mai 2018 21:24, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a > >>> écrit > >>>> : > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've only ever seen feedback of the nature that if people were > >>> willing > >>>> to > >>>>>> do the extra 7.1 work in addition to the TomEE 8 work, it wasn't a > >>>>> problem. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Note, just got off the MicroProfile hangout and there we've proposed > >>> to > >>>>>> doing both a MicroProfile 1.4 and MicroProfile 2.0 release on June > >>> 6th. > >>>>>> The release contents would be the same with the exception of the > >>> minimum > >>>>>> Java EE version; 1.4 will remain at Java EE 7 and MicroProfile 2.0 > >>> will > >>>> be > >>>>>> Java EE 8. Work would probably shift to MicroProfile 2.x > afterwards, > >>>>>> though future MicroProfile 1.x releases could happen if component > >>> specs > >>>>>> want to continue to cater to Java EE 7 or don't have any Java EE > >>>>> dependency > >>>>>> at all. That means MicroProfile will officially have two streams: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - MicroProfile 1.x, Java EE 7, (potential TomEE 7.1) > >>>>>> - MicroProfile 2.x, Java EE 8/Jakarta EE 8, TomEE 8 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> David Blevins > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Apr 30, 2018, at 7:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hmm, can have missed something but didnt the outcome of the thread > >>> have > >>>>>>> been to work in tomee 8 branch (always better to avoid merges ;))? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > >>>>>> rmannibucau> | > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > >>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2018-04-30 16:34 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com > >>>>>> : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi community, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have created a branch based on current master (aka TomEE 7.0.x) > >>> as > >>>>>>>> discussed a while back. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I have backported the microprofile JWT work from TomEE 8 branch. > >>>>>>>> The branch is https://github.com/jeanouii/ > tomee/tree/microprofile_ > >>>>>> backport > >>>>>>>> I have pushed what I have currently in there. I'll need to test > >>> more > >>>>>>>> deeply. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> JLouis > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
