> > we can focus entirely in TomEE 8. +1 Gurkan
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:43 PM Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the idea was to release something quick with MP work on a stable > version. The earliest conversations about this are from March / April and > TomEE 8 was not ready back then. > > Right now, we have TomEE 8 with full MP 1.3 support and TomEE 7.1 with > partial MP 1.2 support. I think there is not much we can do moving forward > in 7.1, since implementations require CDI 2.0 and we can focus entirely in > TomEE 8. > > Cheers, > Roberto > > > On 24 Aug 2018, at 18:26, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +0.5 > > > > > > If there are people willing to work on 7.1, then go on! > > I'll personally focus my bit of spare time to work on TomEE8. > > Happy if people pick this up and backport to 7.1 though. > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > >> Am 09.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]>: > >> > >> That's good feedback, and much appreciated. I have a couple of things to > >> clear "right now", but then I should be back onto working on Java 11 > >> support. Its likely that I'll work on that as opposed to TomEE 8 / MP, > and > >> time permitting, I'd like to work on MP / Jakarta EE items after the J11 > >> support. > >> > >> Long story short though, I believe there are people to work on the > various > >> items, and I'm sure those things can happen in parallel. > >> > >> Specifically, there is a concern that if lots of people work on TomEE > >> 7.1.x, progress is slowed on TomEE 8, and if I'm reading the feedback > >> correctly, some folks would prefer to drop TomEE 7.1.x altogether. > >> > >> Personally, I think those working on MP / Jakarta EE items should be > free > >> to do so, with the guidance of "please commit to master first". > Importantly > >> though, if they wish to backport to another branch, they should not be > >> prevented from doing so. > >> > >> Similarly, I want to work on Java 11 support. I too will commit that to > >> master, but I'd certainly want to backport that support as far back as > >> 1.7.x if it is possible, and I feel I shouldn't be prevented from doing > so. > >> > >> Hopefully that provides some re-assurance about commitment to Java 11, > and > >> some clarification around the VOTE. > >> > >> Jon > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Non-binding: > >>> > >>> -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > >>> compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible (hoping a > >>> fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200...). > >>> > >>> Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 according > >>> to http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/) and most major projects > >>> (Hadoop, etc.) are waiting for this LTS (Long Term Support) version to > >>> move beyond Java 8. > >>> > >>> I have the felling that any major release from TomEE arriving > >>> somewhere in November should be as ready as possible to live with this > >>> "new Java for the couple of upcoming years..." > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Alexandre > >>> Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 08:09, David Blevins <[email protected]> a > >>> écrit : > >>>> > >>>> For a few months we've discussed doing and not doing a TomEE 7 > flavored > >>> release of MicroProfile 1.x for Java EE 7 users on Java 8, tentatively > >>> versioned TomEE 7.1. > >>>> > >>>> Earliest email with TomEE 7.1 in the subject is around April, though I > >>> vaguely recall it mentioned before. I recall seeing a request from > Mark to > >>> wait on it till after 7.0.5 was released. That's now out and a TomEE > 7.1.x > >>> branch has been created and being actively worked on. > >>>> > >>>> There seem to be concerns that this will draw attention away from > TomEE > >>> 8, which is understandable, and some sentiment that this work should > stop > >>> and everyone focus on TomEE 8. I haven't seen anyone suggest not > working > >>> on TomEE 8, so I'll assume that as a constant that doesn't need to be > voted > >>> on. > >>>> > >>>> As the concern is largely resources, I propose the following > compromise: > >>>> > >>>> - MicroProfile related PRs that can possibly apply to TomEE 8 must be > >>> merged to master *before* the equivalent can be merged to TomEE 7.1.x. > In > >>> short, everyone must work on TomEE 8. > >>>> > >>>> - Those who wish to focus time only on TomEE 8 may do so, someone else > >>> can merge the PR to 7.1.x if they have the energy. In short, only the > >>> willing need work on TomEE 7.1.x > >>>> > >>>> With this in mind, the vote: > >>>> > >>>> +1 Allow work on TomEE 7.1 to proceed with the above two conditions > >>>> +-O Abstain or don't feel strongly > >>>> -1 I have a better idea > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>> > > > >
