Interesting, thanks for the info. I'll take a look. Jon
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jon, > > basically just implement a "pipeline" (like java stream with backpressure) > enabling to "fill" the spec todos. It would have like 4-5 primitives > allowing to impl all the spec. Then it is just "Impl" classes to fill. > > FYI i pushed on my github earlier this morning a PoC using java streams and > showing it does not work that well: > https://github.com/rmannibucau/geronimo-reactive-streams > > Main goals would be to not require scala (hope this is a joke ;)), make it > work in EE land (rxjava does not with its schedulers tools) and keep it > very light and dependency free since the spec does nothing much compared to > the jvm itself. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 11:22, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > I'm new to this, and reading through the documentation, so apologies if > > this is a silly question. What would you be specifically looking for in > > terms of a "light implementation" - would that be an alternative to Akka > > Streams, RxJava and Reactor? Are there particular principles, goals or > > designs you had in mind? > > > > Cheers > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok so MP decided to be bloated as the old ee so we will get a light > impl > > > @geronimo - likely next year. Anyone wants to lead it since you asked? > > > > > > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 13:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > > Hi Otavio, > > > > > > > > none yet and the existing ones are either bloated or don't integrate > > well > > > > in any existing stack :( > > > > > > > > FYI the reason it is not @geronimo: > > > > https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile/issues/57 > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 13:14, Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > >> Hi Otávio! > > > >> > > > >> Not on TomEE, have you looked in the Geronimo Side? > > > >> > > > >> +1 to work on reactive streams. If you want help, I can join. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers > > > >> > > > >> Bruno Baptista > > > >> http://twitter.com/brunobat_ > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 20/11/18 12:07, Otávio Gonçalves de Santana wrote: > > > >> > Hello everyone, at the Eclipse Microprofile world there are a lot > of > > > >> > implementations that TomEE covers, but, I did not find the > > > >> implementation > > > >> > to microprofile-reactive-streams > > > >> > <https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-reactive-streams>. > > > >> > > > > >> > Does someone know if this Job has started at the TomEE side? > > > >> > If not, what is the best way to start this initiative? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
