Hi, Quick update on this issue: I found the commits [1] on cxf 3.2.x-fixes branch that added this behavior in the <cxf.version>3.2.7</cxf.version>.
Understanding the version dependency between TomEE, MicroProfile, MicroProfile Rest Client and CXF is kind of tricky. I'm building also a matrix to simplify future troubleshooting to know this 4 dependency chain. Tomorrow I'm going to continue troubleshooting this issue and check if we can fix it with the update Roberto [2] already identified and/or if cxf 3.2.7 broke backward compatibility with 3.2.6 for the MP rest client since the TCK for MP Rest client doesn't cover the scenario added in cxf 3.2.7. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7868 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2282 El vie., 23 nov. 2018 a las 22:32, David Blevins (<david.blev...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > On Nov 23, 2018, at 3:52 PM, César Hernández Mendoza < > cesargu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I did a git bisect and this is the final output: > > > > a5513230e8f77a4985916f901c3eda2c5c45c6d2 is the first bad commit > > commit a5513230e8f77a4985916f901c3eda2c5c45c6d2 > > Author: Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org> > > Date: Tue Oct 30 15:30:06 2018 +0100 > > > > Update CXF to latest release > > > > :100644 100644 42b6643b26a64db3e381159191d588102e80478e > > 732703824b1d27f5c12f3ac6669c0c5a59a63030 M pom.xml > > > > > > Notice that my intention is not to blame anyone, instead, I'm providing > > enough context that allows all of us to help in fixing this issue. > > I would highly appreciate any information you may have about the > background > > of this commit [1], > > I have a saying: The only people who don't break the build are those who > do nothing. :) > > On background, I think it's not more complicated than trying to stay > current. > > > Action for next week: > [..] > > b) It's important also to notice that we definitely need to add to TomEE > > some tests related to MicroProfile rest client integration. > > You hit the nail on the head here. > > If examples are finding bugs, it's a sign we need more tests of our own. > > Mind you, the act of creating examples has an amazing way of surfacing > bugs, just when they do, we should add a test case so the example isn't the > only thing keeping us safe. > > > -David > > > -- Atentamente: César Hernández Mendoza.
