Hi Bruno, I saw your message on the PR. Conflict is now fixed :)! El vie., 14 dic. 2018 a las 22:34, César Hernández Mendoza (< cesargu...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi, > > Since now the current master is using mp rest client 1.1, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2298 is no longer blocking > TOMEE-2297. > > I updated and fixed the PR, now is ready for review: > https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/210 > Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2297 > > El mié., 28 nov. 2018 a las 13:20, César Hernández Mendoza (< > cesargu...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> Hi, >> >> Today I confirmed with Any McCrigth, from CXF project, that this is a bug >> in cxf 3.2.7. >> I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7912 and he will work >> on the fix that I already tested locally building cxf 3.2.8 snapshot. >> >> I updated my PR [1] with the TomEE jira [2] reference in the >> title+commit meesage and also created a ticket to update cxf to 3.2.8[3] >> when the release becomes available. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/210 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2297 >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2298 >> >> >> >> El mar., 27 nov. 2018 a las 21:32, César Hernández Mendoza (< >> cesargu...@gmail.com>) escribió: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Quick update on this issue: >>> I found the commits [1] on cxf 3.2.x-fixes branch that added this >>> behavior in the <cxf.version>3.2.7</cxf.version>. >>> >>> Understanding the version dependency between TomEE, MicroProfile, >>> MicroProfile Rest Client and CXF is kind of tricky. >>> I'm building also a matrix to simplify future troubleshooting to know >>> this 4 dependency chain. >>> >>> Tomorrow I'm going to continue troubleshooting this issue and check if >>> we can fix it with the update Roberto [2] already identified and/or if >>> cxf 3.2.7 broke backward compatibility with 3.2.6 for the MP rest client >>> since the TCK for MP Rest client doesn't cover the scenario added in >>> cxf 3.2.7. >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7868 >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2282 >>> >>> El vie., 23 nov. 2018 a las 22:32, David Blevins (< >>> david.blev...@gmail.com>) escribió: >>> >>>> >>>> > On Nov 23, 2018, at 3:52 PM, César Hernández Mendoza < >>>> cesargu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi everybody, >>>> > >>>> > I did a git bisect and this is the final output: >>>> > >>>> > a5513230e8f77a4985916f901c3eda2c5c45c6d2 is the first bad commit >>>> > commit a5513230e8f77a4985916f901c3eda2c5c45c6d2 >>>> > Author: Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org> >>>> > Date: Tue Oct 30 15:30:06 2018 +0100 >>>> > >>>> > Update CXF to latest release >>>> > >>>> > :100644 100644 42b6643b26a64db3e381159191d588102e80478e >>>> > 732703824b1d27f5c12f3ac6669c0c5a59a63030 M pom.xml >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Notice that my intention is not to blame anyone, instead, I'm >>>> providing >>>> > enough context that allows all of us to help in fixing this issue. >>>> > I would highly appreciate any information you may have about the >>>> background >>>> > of this commit [1], >>>> >>>> I have a saying: The only people who don't break the build are those >>>> who do nothing. :) >>>> >>>> On background, I think it's not more complicated than trying to stay >>>> current. >>>> >>>> > Action for next week: >>>> [..] >>>> > b) It's important also to notice that we definitely need to add to >>>> TomEE >>>> > some tests related to MicroProfile rest client integration. >>>> >>>> You hit the nail on the head here. >>>> >>>> If examples are finding bugs, it's a sign we need more tests of our own. >>>> >>>> Mind you, the act of creating examples has an amazing way of surfacing >>>> bugs, just when they do, we should add a test case so the example isn't the >>>> only thing keeping us safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Atentamente: >>> César Hernández Mendoza. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Atentamente: >> César Hernández Mendoza. >> > > > -- > Atentamente: > César Hernández Mendoza. > -- Atentamente: César Hernández Mendoza.
