+1 El mié., 12 dic. 2018 a las 4:28, Jean-Louis Monteiro (< [email protected]>) escribió:
> To be honest. We'll have to do anyways. So being proactive can be only a > good thing. > > Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 11:25, Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > Thanks for all the responses. Going to give it another 24 hours, just in > > case there's an objection, and then I'll get the process started with > > infra. > > > > Cheers > > > > Jon > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 5:21 PM David Blevins <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Huge +1. That looks amazing. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > David Blevins > > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > On Dec 11, 2018, at 3:44 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Folks > > > > > > > > It appears that the git-wip service is going to be retired, and the > > > > repositories are going to be migrated over to Gitbox - > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/. > > > > > > > > We can voluntarily move to GitBox anytime between now and January 9th > > > 2019. > > > > After January 9th, Infra will require us to move to move within one > > month > > > > by February 7th 2019. > > > > > > > > I propose that we be proactive and look to move now, and we should > get > > > the > > > > benefits of better GitHub integration, which given that we are seeing > > > > bigger numbers of PRs coming through GitHub, this seems to make sense > > to > > > me. > > > > > > > > I'm happy to work with infra, and provide guidance to everyone on > this > > > > list. We don't necessarily need a vote, but we do need consensus on > > this > > > > list in order to move ahead. > > > > > > > > Are there any objections or other feedback? > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > -- Atentamente: César Hernández Mendoza.
