They made the change, the old url is not working anymore. Now you need to point 
your apache remote repo to: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee.git 
<https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee.git>.
´
> On 3 Jan 2019, at 09:40, Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the nudge - I'll give reply on the ticket.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:06 PM César Hernández Mendoza <
> cesargu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> @Jonathan, It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17417 is
>> waiting for your final "go ahead" reply.
>> 
>> El sáb., 29 dic. 2018 a las 10:12, Mark Struberg
>> (<strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>)
>> escribió:
>> 
>>> +1, at minimum the ee-api project should also be moved to gitbox.
>>> 
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>>> Am 28.12.2018 um 22:59 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:12 PM Roberto Cortez
>>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve just remembered about this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> How about other repos not part of the main tomee one but sitting in
>> the
>>>>> project that are on SVN?
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/ <
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/>
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to at least have the javaee-api project moved to Git as
>>> well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Roberto
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13 Dec 2018, at 10:13, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ticket filed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17417
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I believe its basically automated - the git-wip remote will become a
>>>>> gitbox
>>>>>>> remote. I'll ask about the PRs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:06 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you know how smooth it will be?
>>>>>>>> I mean, what about current PRs?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:58 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Looks like we have good support for this, so I'll get this
>> started.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Folks
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It appears that the git-wip service is going to be retired, and
>> the
>>>>>>>>>> repositories are going to be migrated over to Gitbox -
>>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> We can voluntarily move to GitBox anytime between now and January
>>> 9th
>>>>>>>>>> 2019. After January 9th, Infra will require us to move to move
>>> within
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>> month by February 7th 2019.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I propose that we be proactive and look to move now, and we
>> should
>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> benefits of better GitHub integration, which given that we are
>>> seeing
>>>>>>>>>> bigger numbers of PRs coming through GitHub, this seems to make
>>> sense
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to work with infra, and provide guidance to everyone on
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> list. We don't necessarily need a vote, but we do need consensus
>> on
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>> list in order to move ahead.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Are there any objections or other feedback?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Atentamente:
>> César Hernández Mendoza.
>> 

Reply via email to