As I see, this change doesn't require any change to non-committers right?
El jue., 3 ene. 2019 a las 4:04, Roberto Cortez (<radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid>) escribió: > They made the change, the old url is not working anymore. Now you need to > point your apache remote repo to: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee.git < > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee.git>. > ´ > > On 3 Jan 2019, at 09:40, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the nudge - I'll give reply on the ticket. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:06 PM César Hernández Mendoza < > > cesargu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> @Jonathan, It seems https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17417 > is > >> waiting for your final "go ahead" reply. > >> > >> El sáb., 29 dic. 2018 a las 10:12, Mark Struberg > >> (<strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>) > >> escribió: > >> > >>> +1, at minimum the ee-api project should also be moved to gitbox. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>>> Am 28.12.2018 um 22:59 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>: > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:12 PM Roberto Cortez > >>> <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I’ve just remembered about this: > >>>>> > >>>>> How about other repos not part of the main tomee one but sitting in > >> the > >>>>> project that are on SVN? > >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/ < > >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/> > >>>>> > >>>>> I would like to at least have the javaee-api project moved to Git as > >>> well. > >>>>> > >>>>> What do you think? > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Roberto > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 13 Dec 2018, at 10:13, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thank you > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > >>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ticket filed. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17417 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I believe its basically automated - the git-wip remote will become > a > >>>>> gitbox > >>>>>>> remote. I'll ask about the PRs. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:06 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >>>>>>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Do you know how smooth it will be? > >>>>>>>> I mean, what about current PRs? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:58 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > >>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Looks like we have good support for this, so I'll get this > >> started. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > >>>>>>>>> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Folks > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It appears that the git-wip service is going to be retired, and > >> the > >>>>>>>>>> repositories are going to be migrated over to Gitbox - > >>>>>>>>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> We can voluntarily move to GitBox anytime between now and > January > >>> 9th > >>>>>>>>>> 2019. After January 9th, Infra will require us to move to move > >>> within > >>>>>>>> one > >>>>>>>>>> month by February 7th 2019. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I propose that we be proactive and look to move now, and we > >> should > >>>>>>> get > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> benefits of better GitHub integration, which given that we are > >>> seeing > >>>>>>>>>> bigger numbers of PRs coming through GitHub, this seems to make > >>> sense > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> me. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'm happy to work with infra, and provide guidance to everyone > on > >>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>> list. We don't necessarily need a vote, but we do need consensus > >> on > >>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>> list in order to move ahead. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Are there any objections or other feedback? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Many thanks > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Jon > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Atentamente: > >> César Hernández Mendoza. > >> > > -- Atentamente: César Hernández Mendoza.
