Thanks Romain. I'm fine with using Eclipse jars if from a legal point of view, it works. Otherwise, I'd like to split our spec jars.
What about MicroProfile? It's the same license and we are using them in our MicroProfile implementations. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:26 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > depends what their license is. EPL is (weak) copyleft. Thus I would like > to avoid exposing it downstream as api. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 03.09.2019 um 16:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > If we still can't reuse jakata artifacts (their license is ok and there > is > > no impl reference inside so we should just use them, right?) it sounds > > natural > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 16:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > a écrit : > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was digging into some other specifications and see what would pass > >> Jakarta TCK and realized that geronimo-security_1.0_spec content > actually > >> mixes 2 specifications. > >> > >> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/security-api > >> > >> and > >> > >> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaspic > >> > >> I thought the initial intent was to create a specific artifact per > >> specification. > >> Mixing them is a bit annoying from a certification perspective. > >> It's also not clean because in Tomcat for instance, there is already > >> jaspic API so it becomes a duplicate. > >> > >> Would it be possible to split them up in 2 artifacts? > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >
