@Mark: didn't change with jakarta donation? can you open a ticket on jakartee tracker please?
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mer. 4 sept. 2019 à 15:04, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : > No, this is an intended situation. > When one fully passes the TCK then you get the EFSL. This 'removes' the > copyleft nature of the EPL. > The details are quite nested in the legal papers, but that's it basically. > > If we just upgrade our existing API to be binary compat then we have no IP > issues. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 03.09.2019 um 16:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > MP license is ok (Apache2) but Jakarta is EPLs so keeps the ambiguity > for us. > > That said it is good to reuse the same GAV for end users so we might ask > jakarta to double license its api jars? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 16:33, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > > Yep that was the point. > > So I was asking if we should do the same yes or not. > > > > That seems to be your opinion Romain. > > Mark on the other end is having some doubts about the license. > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:31 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 16:29, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > Thanks Romain. I'm fine with using Eclipse jars if from a legal point > of > > > view, it works. > > > Otherwise, I'd like to split our spec jars. > > > > > > What about MicroProfile? > > > > > > > We already agreed to not redo the API and use microprofile jars. > > > > > > > It's the same license and we are using them in our MicroProfile > > > implementations. > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:26 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> depends what their license is. EPL is (weak) copyleft. Thus I would > like > > >> to avoid exposing it downstream as api. > > >> > > >> LieGrue, > > >> strub > > >> > > >> > > >> > Am 03.09.2019 um 16:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > >> > > > >> > If we still can't reuse jakata artifacts (their license is ok and > there > > >> is > > >> > no impl reference inside so we should just use them, right?) it > sounds > > >> > natural > > >> > > > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >> > < > > >> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 16:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > >> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > >> > a écrit : > > >> > > > >> >> Hi all, > > >> >> > > >> >> I was digging into some other specifications and see what would > pass > > >> >> Jakarta TCK and realized that geronimo-security_1.0_spec content > > >> actually > > >> >> mixes 2 specifications. > > >> >> > > >> >> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/security-api > > >> >> > > >> >> and > > >> >> > > >> >> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaspic > > >> >> > > >> >> I thought the initial intent was to create a specific artifact per > > >> >> specification. > > >> >> Mixing them is a bit annoying from a certification perspective. > > >> >> It's also not clean because in Tomcat for instance, there is > already > > >> >> jaspic API so it becomes a duplicate. > > >> >> > > >> >> Would it be possible to split them up in 2 artifacts? > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >> >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >
