It's incredibly amazing what we've all done.  We should all be very proud.

It takes a lot of work to get off the idea stage with bytecode transformation.  
It takes a lot of work to close the last issues.  It takes a big effort to get 
a vote across the finish line at all, let alone this fast.

The last time I saw a vote clear this quickly was TomEE 1.0.0 beta 1 in October 
4th, 2011, the day before JavaOne 2011.

I'm going to take this as a sign. The good-ol-days are ahead of us :)

Massive thank you and congratulations to everyone.  Get ready to do some 
retweeting tomorrow!


-David


> On Jun 22, 2020, at 6:43 AM, Jonathan Gallimore 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Thank you for voting. The following +1 votes were cast:
> 
> Thiago Henrique Hupner
> Cesar Hernandez
> Ivan Junckes Filho
> Nishant Raut
> Daniel Dias Dos Santos
> David Jencks (binding)
> David Blevins (binding)
> Jonathan Gallimore (binding)
> 
> With 8 +1's and no other votes, this vote passes. Thank you everyone for
> your reviews and votes. I'll promote these artifacts and complete the
> release.
> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:01 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M1 and Apache
>> TomEE 8.0.3.
>> 
>> There's some background on this release here:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d89e3c1cd9dba9695e059c96efc8af0d68f18e40c4d4c688801db8d%40%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E
>> 
>> The key points here are:
>> 
>> * TomEE 8.0.3 is essentially identical to TomEE 8.0.2, bar some changes to
>> examples. Release notes are below.
>> 
>> * TomEE 9.0.0-M1 is a transformed version of TomEE 8.0.3, to shift TomEE
>> and all its dependencies from the javax to jakarta namespace.
>> 
>> * If you're targeting Jakarta EE 8, use TomEE 8.0.3. If you would like to
>> try out Jakarta EE 9, with the new namespace, try TomEE 9.0.0-M1. If you
>> build the examples, for most of them you should get a `javax` version and a
>> `jakarta` version. Moviefun is a good app to use to play around.
>> 
>> * TomEE 8.0.3 is production-ready. TomEE 9.0.0-M1 is a milestone. We'd
>> love you to try it, kick the tyres and provide feedback. There will likely
>> be a few milestone releases before we get to a production-ready 9.0.0.
>> 
>> * We expect things to not work with the 9.0.0-M1 version. Feedback is
>> gratefully received, but will be addressed with subsequent releases.
>> Genuine show-stopper issues, such as legal issues, should be voted -1, but
>> bugs or functionality in the 9.0.0-M1 should not prevent this release going
>> ahead. If you have questions around this, please let us know.
>> 
>> * Both versions are built from the same codebase, hence the single vote.
>> 
>> * This vote includes the release of a patch plugin:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee-patch-plugin, and one separate single
>> module to do the translation work for the jakarta version:
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakarta. I'm expecting the
>> tomee-jakara repo to be removed and the module bought back under the tomee
>> tree when we can work out the build issues there.
>> 
>> Maven Repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1172/
>> 
>> Binaries & Source:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1172/tomee-8.0.3/
>> 
>> Tags:
>> 
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.3
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-patch-plugin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-patch-parent-0.1
>> 
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M1
>> 
>> Release notes:
>> 
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348219
>> 
>> Please VOTE:
>> 
>> [+1] Yes, release it
>> [+0] Not fussed
>> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
>> showstopper is)
>> 
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Here is my +1.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Jon
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to