I agree with Thomas. We are not migrating to EE9 (with TomEE) as we are missing the plugins, unit-test containers, arquillian integration, etc. - I guess, the next one will be EE10 to aim for.
Gruss Richard Am Freitag, dem 01.10.2021 um 13:40 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko: > TBH we have to migrate to jakarta anyway. Targeting EE9 or EE10. > > IMO the most people dont care about EE9, so i would branch/tag EE9 on > the > road to EE10 but never maintain or release it. > > Also not sure about the exact timeline, when we should start to > migrate. > > > > > > Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I was looking at a way to do a final release of TomEE 9 but we have > > some > > significant work before we can do that. > > - arquillian integration > > - standalone and lite distributions > > - Maven plugins > > - boms > > > > I was about to add that into tomee-jakarta by having the same > > approach so > > we don't have the cost of maintaining both TomEE 8 and TomEE source > > tree. > > > > But looks like to do that we end up by duplicating pretty much the > > entire > > TomEE tree but the examples. > > > > Is it worth it? > > Should we move master to Jakarta and leave a maintenance branch for > > TomEE > > 8? > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
