Thanks everyone. Same feeling here. I think we tried and pushed it as much as we could.
What we can do is make sure we fix remaining failures on TCK and support JDK 17 with TomEE. Do a release, branch for maintenance and move master to jakarta. Does it sound like an acceptable plan? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe even “Our second release _confirmed_…”… > > David Jencks > > > On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:33 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> - Our first release proved releasing both 8 & 9 together can be > impractical. The TomEE 8 binaries were a dud, only TomEE 9 was released. > There was communication overhead and made for a potentially confusing > release. The TomEE 9 binaries are still very limited. > >> > >> - Our first release proved releasing both 8 & 9 together can be > impractical. The TomEE 8 binaries were released, we didn't release TomEE > 9. It's the second time we've done that. We've only managed one TomEE 9 > release in the last 10 months. > > > > This was supposed to start "our second release". CopyPasteException :) > > > > -David > > > >
