Hello all,

Good news!!  The arm64v8 images should be live shortly.  The commit was 
accepted into official images a few minutes ago.  This also included a Java 17 
JDK for TomEE 8.0.  If that all looks good, I will get 17 ready for TomEE 9.0 
later this week.

Thank you,
Rod.


On 2/16/22, 10:10 AM, "Cesar Hernandez" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use 
CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. (Sender: 
[email protected])

    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    +1 on the proposal to support arm64 for 8,9 with support for java 8, 11,
    and 17.


    El mar, 25 ene 2022 a las 8:47, Jonathan Gallimore (<
    [email protected]>) escribió:

    > That sounds like a good proposal to me, and I'm happy to help test.
    >
    > Jon
    >
    > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
    > [email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Hello,
    > >
    > > I would vote in favor of supporting arm64.  The question for me is how
    > > deep do we go?  I propose 8 and 9 with java support for 8, 11, and 17.
    > >
    > > I will get a branch created so that you can pull it down and test.
    > >
    > > Thank you,
    > > Rod.
    > >
    > >
    > > On 1/24/22, 9:17 AM, "Memo Díaz Solis" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > >     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email.
    > > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or 
responding.
    > > (Sender: [email protected])
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    > >
    > >     If the community agrees on adding support for arm64 then I can test
    > it
    > > if
    > >     you don't mind.
    > >
    > >     El jue, 20 ene 2022 a las 14:24, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) (<
    > >     [email protected]>) escribió:
    > >
    > >     > Hello,
    > >     >
    > >     > If the community would like an arm64 build, I would be happy to
    > > create
    > >     > it.  I do not have the ability to test it.
    > >     >
    > >     > If we decided on this course, what images do we want to create?   
I
    > > would
    > >     > assume 8.x and 9.x.  Would we want to create versions for Java 8,
    > > 11, and
    > >     > 17?  (I would have to look to see what is available.)
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     > Thanks,
    > >     > Rod.
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     > On 1/17/22, 4:39 PM, "Cesar Hernandez" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    > >     >
    > >     >     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
    > > email.
    > >     > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
    > > responding.
    > >     > (Sender: [email protected]
    > )
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >
    > 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     >     Hello,
    > >     >
    > >     >     I saw Gillermo finding about running TomEE docker image on 
macs
    > > with M1
    > >     >     architecture (arm64)
    > >     >     https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/issues/58
    > >     >
    > >     >     I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3827 to
    > > follow
    > >     > up
    > >     >     this topic since it seems there is a workaround [1] but
    > > ultimately I
    > >     > would
    > >     >     like to know what do you think on adding support for arm64, it
    > > seems
    > >     > Tomcat
    > >     >     already is doing this and our base image (openjdk:8-jre)
    > already
    > > has
    > >     >     support for it [2]
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >     >     [1] https://docs.docker.com/desktop/mac/apple-silicon/
    > >     >     [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/arm64v8/openjdk/
    > >     >     --
    > >     >     Atentamente:
    > >     >     César Hernández.
    > >     >
    > >     >
    > >
    > >
    >


    -- 
    Atentamente:
    César Hernández.

Reply via email to