Awesome!!. I just tested on my M1, it runs very fast. docker run -p 7070:8080 tomee:8.0.9-webprofile I attached logs as docker-run.log
17-Feb-2022 23:10:19.477 INFO [main] jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Server startup in [470] milliseconds Thank you. El mié, 16 feb 2022 a las 17:11, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Hello all, > > Good news!! The arm64v8 images should be live shortly. The commit was > accepted into official images a few minutes ago. This also included a Java > 17 JDK for TomEE 8.0. If that all looks good, I will get 17 ready for > TomEE 9.0 later this week. > > Thank you, > Rod. > > > On 2/16/22, 10:10 AM, "Cesar Hernandez" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding. > (Sender: [email protected]) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > +1 on the proposal to support arm64 for 8,9 with support for java 8, > 11, > and 17. > > > El mar, 25 ene 2022 a las 8:47, Jonathan Gallimore (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > That sounds like a good proposal to me, and I'm happy to help test. > > > > Jon > > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 5:28 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would vote in favor of supporting arm64. The question for me is > how > > > deep do we go? I propose 8 and 9 with java support for 8, 11, and > 17. > > > > > > I will get a branch created so that you can pull it down and test. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Rod. > > > > > > > > > On 1/24/22, 9:17 AM, "Memo Díaz Solis" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL > email. > > > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or > responding. > > > (Sender: [email protected] > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > If the community agrees on adding support for arm64 then I can > test > > it > > > if > > > you don't mind. > > > > > > El jue, 20 ene 2022 a las 14:24, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) (< > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > If the community would like an arm64 build, I would be happy > to > > > create > > > > it. I do not have the ability to test it. > > > > > > > > If we decided on this course, what images do we want to > create? I > > > would > > > > assume 8.x and 9.x. Would we want to create versions for > Java 8, > > > 11, and > > > > 17? (I would have to look to see what is available.) > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rod. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/17/22, 4:39 PM, "Cesar Hernandez" <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an > EXTERNAL > > > email. > > > > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or > > > responding. > > > > (Sender: dev-return-28775-JENKIR14= > [email protected] > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I saw Gillermo finding about running TomEE docker image > on macs > > > with M1 > > > > architecture (arm64) > > > > https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/issues/58 > > > > > > > > I created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3827 to > > > follow > > > > up > > > > this topic since it seems there is a workaround [1] but > > > ultimately I > > > > would > > > > like to know what do you think on adding support for > arm64, it > > > seems > > > > Tomcat > > > > already is doing this and our base image (openjdk:8-jre) > > already > > > has > > > > support for it [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://docs.docker.com/desktop/mac/apple-silicon/ > > > > [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/arm64v8/openjdk/ > > > > -- > > > > Atentamente: > > > > César Hernández. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Atentamente: > César Hernández. > >
