Hi!

Can I choose the Jakarta Faces TCK?

Thanks:
Zoltán


On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 1:06 AM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > On Jan 5, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Zoltán Tichov <zoltan.tic...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Be it as you wrote. What should I do now?
>
> If you want to help learn & setup the new standalone TCKs, that’d be a
> fantastic way to contribute.  Basically, any of the ones in this list that
> isn’t already assigned is up for grabs.
>
>  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4155
>
> If that sounds interesting, pick a TCK and someone can assign you the JIRA.
>
> Most of these TCKs were in the main Jakarta EE TCK and were completely
> reworked.  Spec teams were allowed to use any testing framework or approach
> they liked, so we’re all starting from zero on how these new TCKs work.
> One of the rare situations where there isn’t someone who knows how they
> work and can provide help -- we’re all newbies on these new TCKs.
>
> Previously the only standalone TCKs were bean validation, CDI and the
> MicroProfile TCKs.  They all live here:
>
>  - https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/main/tck
>
> We should probably put all the new TCK setups there until we decide
> otherwise.
>
>
> -David
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:41 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think first, we should get the 2 PRs in. From experience, delaying
> them
> >> makes it frustrating and painful because you have to rebase all the
> time.
> >>
> >> Then create a new issue assigned to version 10.x (or we can create it
> for
> >> you because of the new Apache restrictions). So you can create the PR
> for
> >> MVC in TomEE.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:34 PM Zoltán Tichov <zoltan.tic...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi!
> >>>
> >>> I could help, but I have a task, which I'm not ready yet ( put jakarta
> >> mvc
> >>> 2.0 and tck in tomee).
> >>> What to do with this task?
> >>>
> >>> I also have two pending pull requests, should I synchronize them with
> the
> >>> new main branch?
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/990
> >>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/962
> >>>
> >>> Thanks:
> >>> Zoltán
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 9:12 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like the TomEE 9.0.0 final release is in good shape and the vote
> >> is
> >>>> about to pass. Awesome.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm already looking forward to TomEE 10.x. To that regard, I created a
> >>>> branch for 9.x maintenance already. Moved main to 10.0.0-SNAPSHOT. I
> >>>> upgraded Tomcat already and I'm looking to upgrade CXF to its latest
> >>>> jakarta version. I decided to remove all the shading and patching all
> >>>> together so we get back to a Maven based dependency. We can cherry
> pick
> >>> on
> >>>> demand or even contribute to CXF if they are willing to accept the
> >>>> contributions.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here are a set of small actions before we enter into the actual game
> of
> >>>> supporting Jakarta EE 10 and MicroProfile 6.0
> >>>>
> >>>> TODOs:
> >>>> - create jobs for TomEE 9.x maintenance
> >>>> - update tomee-tck to create a new branch for 10.x
> >>>> - update tomee-tck
> >>>> - release 9.1 API final (we have M2 for 9.0.0 final which is ok, but
> we
> >>>> should release it so next time it's included).
> >>>> - create 10.x API and release a M1
> >>>>
> >>>> Who can help on what?
> >>>> Creating a JIRA with sub tasks so we can track the work to do and
> >>>> coordinate is also a good contribution.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to