Hi all,

it seems that dbcp2 has no real intention to provide us with "real"
jakarta packages. If we want to drop the shade artifact in TomEE 9 /
10, we would need to drop our dbcp2 integration (or stick with the
shading).

Do we have any good reason to keep it in TomEE 9 / 10? Otherwise, -
based on Romains comment below - I am inclined to just drop it? Wdyt?


Gruß
Richard

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Antwort an: Commons Developers List <d...@commons.apache.org>
An: Commons Developers List <d...@commons.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: Jakarta namespace in commons like dbcp - thoughts / ideas?
Datum: Fri, 26 May 2023 12:20:59 +0200

> Hi Richard,
> 
> TomEE can drop managed package legacy dependency now, was kept while
> the
> replacement was in test in 1.x version but makes years it is no more
> relevant and no more the default (since we switched to tomcat-jdbc).
> So no big deal if dbcp wants to drop it on TomEE side IMHO.
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-perfor
> mance>
> 
> 
> Le ven. 26 mai 2023 à 12:19, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
> 
> > The current TomEE codebase still uses classes from the "managed"
> > package of dbcp2. (Thus, we are shading it for TomEE 9 / 10)
> > 
> > We might be able to drop that integration at some point but
> > currently
> > our focus is on getting a EE10 milestone out of the door, so I
> > don't
> > think, that it is a theoretical issue.
> > 
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> > 
> > 
> > Am Freitag, dem 26.05.2023 um 12:08 +0200 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> > > Le 11/05/2023 à 15:56, Richard Zowalla a écrit :
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > do we have any updates?
> > > > 
> > > > How can I help to get a dbcp version supporting Jakarta
> > > > namespace?
> > > > 
> > > > Emmanuel outlined a possible appraoch. How can we move forward
> > > > with
> > > > it?
> > > 
> > > I'm tempted to merge the dual-javax-jakarta branch, but Romain's
> > > comment
> > > about TomEE no longer using the managed package made me wonder if
> > > we
> > > really need to bother at all.
> > > 
> > > Are we trying to fix a theoretical issue or are there actual
> > > users of
> > > these classes expecting a fix?
> > > 
> > > Emmanuel Bourg
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ----
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to