Just to check, you all know this isn't a list of all endpoints in Traffic Ops, right? As the issue says, "all tables queried for the CRConfig."
That list, which really existed for my own use for Self Service, is only the endpoints which query tables used in the CRConfig, and not including ATS configs. It's a lot of endpoints, but not all of them. If you want a list of all of them, you'll have to compare TrafficOpsRoutes.pm and routes.go. Also be aware, for the rewrite, there may be several non-API routes which are still used by Traffic Control, and will have to be rewritten as new /api endpoints before Perl can be removed. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:15 AM ocket 8888 <ocket8...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, that's the plan > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:08 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Just so we're clear on what your asking. You want to create a github > issue > > for each unchecked item in this issue, right? > > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2232 > > > > Then what? close 2232? Each endpoint can be tackled individually so that > > seems to make sense to me. > > > > Jeremy > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 7:11 AM ocket 8888 <ocket8...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > So it seems that at least we can all agree these should have their own > > > issues, so far. I'll leave the question of label/milestone/project > > > unanswered for now and just start opening issues. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 7:49 PM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think the `TO API Golang Rewrite` actually makes perfect sense as a > > > > milestone. It will truly be "milestone" when we finish that. I'm good > > if > > > > others are (or are not opposed). > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:58 PM ocket8888 <ocket8...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Huh. That's new. btw, I don't think you can send images through the > > > > > mailing list > > > > > > > > > > I still think a project is overkill, as it depends on assigning > > things > > > > > to people, tracking things that are "In Progress" and whatnot. It > > > > > doesn't give you anything that a milestone wouldn't. > > > > > > > > > > There's no reason a milestone must correspond to some release. > > > > > > > > > > On 8/5/19 3:51 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > image.png > > > > > > looks like a project "tracks absolute progress toward some goal". > > > it's > > > > > > got a progress bar and everything: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/projects/2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't be opposed to creating a project as well, but I'm > > > > skeptical > > > > > > that it would be used. > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be used if you managed it and made sure it stayed up to > > > date. > > > > > > You can also set up projects to auto-update. When you create the > > > > > > project, select the type. for example: > > > > > > > > > > > > /Automated kanban > > > > > > Kanban-style board with built-in triggers to automatically move > > > issues > > > > > > and pull requests across To do, In progress and Done columns. > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:20 PM ocket8888 <ocket8...@gmail.com > > > > > > <mailto:ocket8...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > A project is a way of organizing work by keeping track of who > > is > > > > > > working > > > > > > on what and at what stage a particular part of the project > is. > > A > > > > > > milestone tracks absolute progress toward some goal, which is > > all > > > > I'm > > > > > > seeking to accomplish. > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't be opposed to creating a project as well, but I'm > > > > > > skeptical > > > > > > that it would be used. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote: > > > > > > > I've just always associated milestone with release for some > > > > > > reason... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Feels like a "project" to me however. Oh look at that there > > was > > > > > > one for > > > > > > > this at one time: > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/projects?query=is%3Aclosed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:56 PM ocket8888 < > > ocket8...@gmail.com > > > > > > <mailto:ocket8...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> As far as I know, the only thing you get with a Milestone > > > > > > (immediately > > > > > > >> and by default) that doesn't come with a label is the > > ability > > > > > > to track > > > > > > >> progress towards reaching that milestone. Which I think is > > > > > > appropriate > > > > > > >> here - and is actually all of my motivation for > suggesting a > > > > > > milestone > > > > > > >> rather than a label. What "baggage" do you mean? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 8/5/19 2:52 PM, Chris Lemmons wrote: > > > > > > >>> I agree that separate tickets is ideal. Would a tag work > > for > > > > this > > > > > > >>> purpose? Milestones have other baggage that doesn't apply > > > here. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:16 PM ocket 8888 < > > > ocket8...@gmail.com > > > > > > <mailto:ocket8...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> Currently to see what endpoints are rewritten and which > > > still > > > > > > need to be > > > > > > >>>> done, you need to check out this one, specific issue Rob > > > made > > > > > > forever > > > > > > >> ago: > > > > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/2232 > > > > > > >>>> I think it'd be better to give each endpoint its own > > Issue - > > > > > > only the > > > > > > >> ones > > > > > > >>>> that still need to be rewritten - and then link them all > > in > > > a > > > > > "Go > > > > > > >> Rewrite" > > > > > > >>>> milestone. It's much easier to organize. Then we can > stop > > > > > > re-building > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > >>>> list. > > > > > > >>>> I volunteer to comb through the list and figure out what > > > > > > endpoints > > > > > > >> actually > > > > > > >>>> are rewritten and do the work of creating issues for > them, > > > > > > provided > > > > > > >> that's > > > > > > >>>> acceptable to everyone? I think we typically only use > > > > > > milestones for > > > > > > >>>> releases, so I thought I should check. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
