Let me try that again. Bad links.

-1 due to the fact that the dual homing feature (one of the 5.x drivers)
does not appear to be working -
https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/5695 - until this PR is
merged: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/5730

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:58 PM Jeremy Mitchell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> -1 due to the fact that the dual homing feature (one of the 5.x drivers)
> does not appear to be working -
> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/5712 - until this PR is
> merged: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/pull/5730
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 2:06 PM Zach Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> There is not currently a way using the `pkg` command, unfortunately. I
>> posted a hacky way to do it in another thread:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7adb9b427ed9651c6a0d6cf722d17412e55da4dbecb5985bc622e674%40%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
>>
>> Does the Traffic Portal RPM build successfully for you now?
>>
>> -Zach
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 11:56 AM Hank Beatty <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Is there a way to use docker-compose so that all components can be built
>> > in parallel instead of in serial?
>> >
>> > On 4/9/21 1:40 PM, Zach Hoffman wrote:
>> > >> That's the command for CentOS 7?
>> > >
>> > > It is not, CentOS 7 is
>> > >
>> > >      ./pkg -v -7 traffic_portal_build
>> > >
>> > > The command for CentOS 7 builds the Traffic Portal RPM successfully
>> for
>> > me,
>> > > as well, using
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/trafficcontrol/5.1.2/RC2/apache-trafficcontrol-5.1.2.tar.gz
>> > > as sources.
>> > >
>> > > -Zach
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 11:18 AM Hank Beatty <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> That's the command for CentOS 7?
>> > >>
>> > >> On 4/9/21 1:03 PM, Zach Hoffman wrote:
>> > >>>> -1 The traffic_portal rpm does not build for me.
>> > >>> I'm having trouble reproducing this, the Traffic Portal RPM built
>> > >>> successfully for me when building using
>> > >>>
>> > >>>       ./pkg -v traffic_portal_build
>> > >>>
>> > >>> using
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/trafficcontrol/5.1.2/RC2/apache-trafficcontrol-5.1.2.tar.gz
>> > >>> as sources.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> -Zach
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:56 AM Hank Beatty <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> -1 The traffic_portal rpm does not build for me.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> /usr/lib/node_modules/grunt-cli/node_modules/micromatch/index.js:44
>> > >>>>        let isMatch = picomatch(String(patterns[i]), { ...options,
>> > >> onResult
>> > >>>> }, true);
>> > >>>>                                                       ^^^
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> SyntaxError: Unexpected token ...
>> > >>>>        at createScript (vm.js:56:10)
>> > >>>>        at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:97:10)
>> > >>>>        at Module._compile (module.js:549:28)
>> > >>>>        at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:586:10)
>> > >>>>        at Module.load (module.js:494:32)
>> > >>>>        at tryModuleLoad (module.js:453:12)
>> > >>>>        at Function.Module._load (module.js:445:3)
>> > >>>>        at Module.require (module.js:504:17)
>> > >>>>        at require (internal/module.js:20:19)
>> > >>>>        at Object.<anonymous>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> (/usr/lib/node_modules/grunt-cli/node_modules/findup-sync/index.js:12:10)
>> > >>>> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9gsYil (%build)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> RPM build errors:
>> > >>>>        Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9gsYil (%build)
>> > >>>> RPM BUILD FAILED: 1
>> > >>>> Error on line 1 of traffic_portal/build/build_rpm.sh
>> > >>>> traffic_portal failed: traffic_portal/build/build_rpm.sh
>> > >>>> The following subdirectories had errors:
>> > >>>>       traffic_portal
>> > >>>> Error on line 1 of ./build/build.sh
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 4/7/21 12:11 PM, ocket 8888 wrote:
>> > >>>>> Hello All,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I've prepared a release for v5.1.2-RC2
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority
>> of at
>> > >>>> least
>> > >>>>> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Changes since 5.1.1:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-5.1.1...RELEASE-5.1.2-RC
>> > >>>>> <
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-5.1.1...RELEASE-5.1.2-RC1
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> 2
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> This corresponds to git:
>> > >>>>> Hash: 924138d143febb66e926f0e6be82b22d450bfbd9
>> > >>>>> Tag: RELEASE-5.1.2-RC2
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Which can be verified with the following: git tag -v
>> > RELEASE-5.1.2-RC2
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> My code signing key is available here:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?search=0xF5D560A373B76FA302A95DBFCDFE430685982C95&fingerprint=on&op=index
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Make sure you refresh from a key server to get all relevant
>> > signatures.
>> > >>>>> The source .tgz file, pgp signature (.asc signed with my key from
>> > >>>>> above), and sha512 checksums are provided here:
>> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/trafficcontrol/5.1.2/RC2
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Thanks!
>> > >>>>> ocket8888 [email protected]
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to