> Isn't this email almost like a survey? Anyone doing API work is probably on > this ML or should be.
That's kind of my point, not many people doing external development against the TO API are chiming in, but the majority of TO developers are in favor of this proposal. > Brennan, do you have a link to that discussion? If it wasn't on list then it > didn't happen ;) That came from this long thread we had about the TO API v2 transition: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0c59606029f6363dc19bbefa4cddd698891d4dad9f142f09a14c89fe%40%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E The TO API v1 removal was pushed out of ATC 5.0 despite the agreement that was made. I'd be ok with only removing TO API v2 in ATC 7.0 and removing TO API v3 in 7.1 or 8.0 (whatever is soonest), but we really need to get to the point where we only support a single major TO API version so that we can eliminate all the tech debt and cruft that comes with supporting so many different versions. - Rawlin
