Thanks Steve. Much appreciated.

~A

From: Steve Hamrick <shamr...@apache.org>
Date: Friday, February 11, 2022 at 9:39 AM
To: dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org <dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: TC Q2 release (6.2 or 7.0?)
I'd be interested in being a release manager.

Steve H


On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:12 AM Jeremy Mitchell <mitchell...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> any more thoughts here? otherwise, looks like our next version will be 7.0
> (api 4.x stablization and api 2.x removal tbd). this means we will need a
> new volunteer for release manager. any volunteers?
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:05 PM Rawlin Peters <raw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > We don't really support upgrading more than one major version at a
> > time anyways (esp. due to things like squashing the DB migrations), so
> > you generally need to upgrade only one major version at a time (e.g.
> > 4.x -> 5.x -> 6.x -> 7.x).
> >
> > - Rawlin
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:47 PM Gray, Jonathan
> > <jonathan_g...@comcast.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > Removing API 2.x will mean that there is no migration path from ATC 4.x
> > to ATC 7 without jumping through ATC 5||6 to get to API 3.0+.  This might
> > be ok, but just a reminder.  Specifically the existing ansible code still
> > relies on API 2.x as well.
> > >
> > > Jonathan G
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Rawlin Peters <raw...@apache.org>
> > > Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 3:32 PM
> > > To: dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org <dev@trafficcontrol.apache.org>
> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: TC Q2 release (6.2 or 7.0?)
> > > If we decide that we're going to declare TO API 4.x stable as part of
> > > ATC 7.0 on April 1, we're effectively setting a deadline for
> > > work-in-progress (Layered Profiles) upon which the release hinges.
> > > Ideally, we would wait until the Layered Profiles feature is
> > > implemented in TO API 4.0 before we consider stabilizing TO API 4.0.
> > > We don't want to delay the release because a new feature isn't ready
> > > yet.
> > >
> > > That said, I don't see a problem with removing API 2.x and Riak
> > > support (as well as any of those other "major" things) and calling it
> > > ATC 7.0.
> > >
> > > - Rawlin
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 12:33 PM Jeremy Mitchell <
> mitchell...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In today's TC working group, we discussed our next official release
> > slated
> > > > for Q2 (April 1). We have 2 options:
> > > >
> > > > 1. TC 6.2.0
> > > > 2. TC 7.0.0
> > > >
> > > > ^^ note: this doesn't include any patch releases we may need prior to
> > April
> > > > 1.
> > > >
> > > > We felt option #2 was probably the better option so we could:
> > > >
> > > > - stabilize API 4.x which is currently "unstable"
> > > > - deprecate API 3.x which is currently considered "stable"
> > > > - remove API 2.x which is currently deprecated
> > > > - optionally (if needed) add API 5.x as "unstable" to allow more
> > breaking
> > > > API changes if needed
> > > >
> > > > In addition, we could potentially remove RIAK support
> > > > <
> >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/6546__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XgJ4rHATX7p8UEz7mVduk1HnteBDNBxQEqUFIHrEMRI4nE5CjpvAiRCK-UuVbZ2wWxcU$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/6546__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!XgJ4rHATX7p8UEz7mVduk1HnteBDNBxQEqUFIHrEMRI4nE5CjpvAiRCK-UuVbZ2wWxcU$>
> > >, introduce a
> > > > new/replacement auth mechanism (i.e. JWT) and upgrade TR to Java 17
> as
> > well
> > > > as other "major" things.
> > > >
> > > > Or, we could do none/subset of that and plan on a 6.2 for April.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> >
>

Reply via email to