I’m +1 as well
Checked out:
- signatures/checksums (Hank is your key signed yet?)
- licenses
- build
—Eric
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Nir Sopher <n...@qwilt.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> We were able to build traffic-control, install and connect OPs, Portal-V2,
> Monitor (Golang), Router and Stats.
> Also got a redirect.
> Note that I missed the last commit ("Change cdn.name to cdn.domain_name in
> DeliveryServiceInfoForDomainList"), but as far as I see it could not break
> the installation.
> Nir
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
> efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Matt-
>> I found another LEGAL ticket (https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/LEGAL-330) based on a Google version of the PATENTS file this
>> time.
>>
>> Looks like things are OK to use then.
>>
>> —Eric
>>
>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Mills, Matthew <matthew_mi...@comcast.com<
>> mailto:matthew_mi...@comcast.com>> wrote:
>>
>> FYI, Go itself has the same file
>>
>> https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/PATENTS
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/17, 10:36:43 AM, "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <efrie...@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’ve been going through licensing for the 2.1 release and found this
>> file:
>> ./traffic_stats/vendor/golang.org/x/net/PATENTS<http://
>> golang.org/x/net/PATENTS>
>>
>> This looks like it places some of the same restrictions that caused the
>> whole Facebook React.js and rocksDb controversy a few months ago.
>> Fun reading here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-303
>> There’s some in depth discussion of the detailed Facebook license, I
>> can’t even begin to speculate how that compares to this Google conditional
>> patent grant.
>>
>> We can see what the IPMC/Legal thinks or maybe just remove the code?
>>
>> —Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
