+1 -- I checked signature, checksums, build, fresh install of traffic_ops.
-dan
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes, of course. How does Friday 11/17 or Monday 20/17 sound?
>
> On 11/14/2017 04:09 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
>>
>> Hey Hank,
>> It looks like you have the votes you need to pass, but can you leave it
>> open a little longer for those of us that haven't gotten a chance to test
>> yet?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dave
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
>> efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I’m +1 as well
>>>
>>> Checked out:
>>> - signatures/checksums (Hank is your key signed yet?)
>>> - licenses
>>> - build
>>>
>>> —Eric
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Nir Sopher <n...@qwilt.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> We were able to build traffic-control, install and connect OPs,
>>>
>>> Portal-V2,
>>>>
>>>> Monitor (Golang), Router and Stats.
>>>> Also got a redirect.
>>>> Note that I missed the last commit ("Change cdn.name to cdn.domain_name
>>>
>>> in
>>>>
>>>> DeliveryServiceInfoForDomainList"), but as far as I see it could not
>>>
>>> break
>>>>
>>>> the installation.
>>>> Nir
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) <
>>>> efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Matt-
>>>>> I found another LEGAL ticket (https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>> jira/browse/LEGAL-330) based on a Google version of the PATENTS file
>>>
>>> this
>>>>>
>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like things are OK to use then.
>>>>>
>>>>> —Eric
>>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:50 PM, Mills, Matthew <matthew_mi...@comcast.com
>>>
>>> <
>>>>>
>>>>> mailto:matthew_mi...@comcast.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI, Go itself has the same file
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/PATENTS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/14/17, 10:36:43 AM, "Eric Friedrich (efriedri)" <
>>>
>>> efrie...@cisco.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve been going through licensing for the 2.1 release and found this
>>>>> file:
>>>>> ./traffic_stats/vendor/golang.org/x/net/PATENTS<http://
>>>>> golang.org/x/net/PATENTS>
>>>>>
>>>>> This looks like it places some of the same restrictions that caused
>>>
>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>> whole Facebook React.js and rocksDb controversy a few months ago.
>>>>> Fun reading here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-303
>>>>> There’s some in depth discussion of the detailed Facebook license, I
>>>>> can’t even begin to speculate how that compares to this Google
>>>
>>> conditional
>>>>>
>>>>> patent grant.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can see what the IPMC/Legal thinks or maybe just remove the code?
>>>>>
>>>>> —Eric
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
