I like focusing the web site on users, and user on the brink of becoming contributors. Information for active contributors would go on the wiki. It is usually less stable and has a smaller audience so good to be very easy to change. I don't think this decision has to be made up front.
Kenn On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:27 PM Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > good points. Didn't think of that kind of content. Let's order it when we > need it. I think they are created within hours. > > Cheers, > Lars > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:13 PM Furkan KAMACI <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I think that we don't need a wiki but Sharan is right. We can use a wiki > to > > report our discussing or drafts via their specialized templates. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 8:30 PM Sharan Foga <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Lars > > > > > > Good point! > > > > > > I think once we start discussing roadmaps, strategies or plans etc, > then > > > documenting the thoughts and ideas might be better in a wiki. Let's > first > > > get the website up and running then take it from there. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Sharan > > > > > > On 2019/02/22 22:25:45, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Do we need a wiki now? > > > > > > > > I don't really have an opinion on this but don't see the need right > > now. > > > > Especially when we have a website up and running. > > > > > > > > > >
