Yes, for me it works. Thank you

пн, 25 февр. 2019 г., 20:54 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>:

> Does it work now?
> Even if I said "everyone with a link" slak keeps on asking me to grant
> permissions :/
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 25.02.19, 18:47 schrieb "Dmitriy Pavlov" <[email protected]>:
>
>     Hi Chris, could you please add view permission for the google document?
>     Thank you.
>
>     пн, 25 февр. 2019 г. в 20:44, Christofer Dutz <
> [email protected]>:
>
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I'm not suggesting to build something ... it's sort of already there:
>     > Here an export of one of my current presentation template:
>     >
>     > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pZ5l9X__gTM4vg2PJRbc-0GXuEf058aI
>     >
>     > It uses Asciidoc and I quite like that in general for all sorts of
> use
>     > cases.
>     > Markdown to me appears a lot less powerful and extensible (but that
> just
>     > might be me dropping the ball on that quite some time ago)
>     > Doc-book and Latech I remember being quite low level and I don't know
>     > reStructuredText.
>     >
>     > Regarding images I started adopting PlantUML and DITAA quite some
> time ago
>     > and quite recently am updating to SVGBob
>     > https://github.com/ivanceras/svgbob
>     >
>     > Regarding your format ... just have a look at the content of
>     > src/main/asciidoc/index.adoc
>     > In the Zip file ... that's pretty much what you describe.
>     > Most of these require some installed open-source tools to render
> images
>     > correctly and I have started setting up some init scripts to install
>     > missing things, but that still needs quite a lot of love to be in a
>     > releasable state.
>     > Currently it's just something I use myself and the scripts are more a
>     > reminder to myself of how to install things.
>     >
>     > Please have a look.
>     >
>     > Chris
>     >
>     >
>     > Am 25.02.19, 17:42 schrieb "Sönke Liebau" <
> [email protected]
>     > .INVALID>:
>     >
>     >     I agree with Mirko, I don't think we should head down the route
> of
>     >     creating a full blown publishing framework or similar.
>     >
>     >     The issue, at least to my mind, is divided into two main things:
>     >     - text content (which I consider to include tables, lists, etc.)
>     >     - graphical content
>     >
>     >     For text content there are quite a few good options out there, we
>     >     probably just need to conduct a hunt for the main competitors and
>     >     agree on one that meets most needs. Otoh the main ones are
> probably:
>     >     - asciidoc
>     >     - markdown
>     >     - doc-book
>     >     - latex
>     >     - reStructuredText
>     >
>     >     For graphical content my personal opinion is that the
> possibilities
>     >     are simply endless and we should not necessarily be trying to
> restrict
>     >     what people may want to use either. For the "compiled"
> presentation in
>     >     the end I think the common denominator will always be "a
> picture" (no
>     >     other way to express a photo or a logo) and I personally think
> it is
>     >     fine.
>     >     The way of getting at this image is what I think we should be
> focusing
>     >     on, so the basic idea would be to have a text representation of
> the
>     >     image in version control and at "compile" time create the actual
> image
>     >     that is then part of the release.
>     >     For the "text representation" part there are a lot of possible
>     >     options, what I have used a lot in the past is for example:
>     >     - websequencediagrams [1]
>     >     - draw.io [2]
>     >
>     >     But since there are so many services out there that offer
> something
>     >     similar I think this should really be something extensible so
> that
>     >     people can develop converters for their own formats. For the
> Apache
>     >     training content we should then probably have a rule that only
>     >     converters that are part of the official repo may be used for
> content,
>     >     which allows us to curate a little.
>     >
>     >     So basically in version control slides might then look like this:
>     >
>     >     == Slide One
>     >
>     >     * Foo
>     >     * Bar
>     >     * World
>     >
>     >     == Slide Two
>     >     >>> imageContent(websequencediagram)
>     >     User->Server: Connect
>     >     Server->User: Respond
>     >     <<<
>     >
>     >     Whereas the content of the wsd part would be replaced by the
>     >     corresponding picture when building the actual slides.
>     >
>     >
>     >     Hope that made a little sense? Otherwise I am happy to elaborate
>     > further :)
>     >
>     >     Best regards,
>     >     Sönke
>     >
>     >
>     >     [1] https://www.websequencediagrams.com/
>     >     [2] https://www.draw.io/
>     >
>     >     On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:17 PM Mirko Kämpf <
> [email protected]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > Hi,
>     >     > regarding content versioning, I suggest to search formar like
>     > doc-book xml
>     >     > (it can be anything which allows Separation of content and
> Style).
>     >     > With this, we can generate PDF, PPT, Google-Presentations for
> final
>     >     > customization.
>     >     >
>     >     > The issue is, how to convert a result from a creativity session
>     > incl. media
>     >     > content / sketches / fotos back into such a fundamental format.
>     >     >
>     >     > I suggest not to try to build another CMS or publishing
> Framework,
>     > but
>     >     > rather Focus on the process of content creation/Update.
>     >     >
>     >     > Cheers,
>     >     > Mirko
>     >     >
>     >     > Lars Francke <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 23. Feb.
>     > 2019, 16:23:
>     >     >
>     >     > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 7:31 PM Sharan Foga <
> [email protected]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > On 2019/02/22 23:12:29, Lars Francke <
> [email protected]>
>     > wrote:
>     >     > > > > During the DISCUSS and VOTE threads I tried to postpone
> any
>     > discussion
>     >     > > > > about the actual content and technical bits but now
> would be a
>     > great
>     >     > > time
>     >     > > > > to start.
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > I know that Dmitriy was eager to get started and
> Christofer
>     > also
>     >     > > > explained
>     >     > > > > his workflow briefly. Maybe you could go into more
> detail?
>     >     > > > > Christofer demonstrated his own tooling to us and I
> really
>     > liked it.
>     >     > > This
>     >     > > > > could be a great start.
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > I'm sorry this is going to be a bit longer and maybe a
> bit
>     > "rambling".
>     >     > > > Take
>     >     > > > > it as you will. I just needed to write it down once :)
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > When we've done trainings so far they usually consist of
> a
>     > couple of
>     >     > > > things:
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > * Slides (for us usually in Powerpoint)
>     >     > > > > * Whiteboard sessions (usually the most interesting parts
>     > because they
>     >     > > > > usually are the result of attendee feedback/questions)
>     >     > > > > * Labs (the actual content, things that attendees need to
>     > "solve"/do)
>     >     > > > > * Lab setup (especially for the larger distributed
> systems
>     > getting a
>     >     > > > > realistic setup of the tools itself for all attendees
> isn't
>     > trivia
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > I'm sure I'm missing something.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > Thanks Lars - this is good. Off the top of my head a
> couple of
>     > things
>     >     > > came
>     >     > > > to mind - the first is testing (to see how much attendees
> have
>     > learned
>     >     > > and
>     >     > > > this could be linked to certification which I think was
>     > mentioned in one
>     >     > > of
>     >     > > > the threads) and the second was a way of collecting
> feedback
>     > about the
>     >     > > > training - so perhaps a survey
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > Those are good points I didn't think of.
>     >     > >
>     >     > > Tests we have never done by choice but I see that people
> might be
>     >     > > interested in them and surveys are something that we probably
>     > should have
>     >     > > done ourselves a long time ago already. So: Definitely.
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > > > What should our scope be?
>     >     > > > > Our initial idea centered around Slides and Labs. It
> would be
>     > great to
>     >     > > > also
>     >     > > > > have something that makes the Labs setup easier but in
> our
>     > experience
>     >     > > > > that's pretty hard (e.g. corporate firewalls don't allow
>     > access to X or
>     >     > > > Y)
>     >     > > > > to make generic (that shouldn't stop us from trying!)
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > Slides:
>     >     > > > > I'd love to have a workflow where I can design slides
>     > entirelly in
>     >     > > > > Asciidoc. That makes them easily versionable and
> composable.
>     > Should we
>     >     > > > > allow multiple formats? If we decide on a text-only
> format and
>     > someone
>     >     > > > > donates a bunch of courses in Powerpoint. Would we deny
> that?
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > I think that we would want to accept contribution that is
>     > relevant. There
>     >     > > > may be an overhead to convert the content into a more
> generic
>     > format but
>     >     > > > that's doable especially if it encourages contributions.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > I assume you meant "any contribution"?
>     >     > > In general I agree but any binary format (e.g. Powerpoint -
> I'll
>     > call it
>     >     > > binary even though it's really XML now but it's pretty
> useless for
>     > what I'm
>     >     > > going to mention or PDF) has the problem that doing reviews
> is
>     > tedious to
>     >     > > impossible. There's no good way (I know of) to create diffs
> for
>     > example and
>     >     > > people on Linux are left out entirely for Powerpoint.
>     >     > >
>     >     > > I currently believe having "one true format" for all of them
> is a
>     > good idea
>     >     > > (I am happy to be convinced otherwise), maybe with a kind of
>     > "staging" area
>     >     > > of accepted contributons that have yet to be converted and
> are not
>     > coverd
>     >     > > by "quality guarantees".
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > Labs:
>     >     > > > > Similarly for Labs we've had a good experience with
> (e.g.)
>     >     > > > > https://antora.org/ which also allows to create
> documentation
>     > in
>     >     > > > Asciidoc
>     >     > > > > and create a website out of it. But there's lots of
> ideas on
>     > how to
>     >     > > > improve
>     >     > > > > this (e.g. Notebooks in Zeppelin) and it'll also be way
>     > different
>     >     > > > depending
>     >     > > > > on the training topic.
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > Audience/Customizability/Composability
>     >     > > > > I would assume that our trainings will also be used by
>     > non-commercial
>     >     > > > folks
>     >     > > > > or people needing to give a training in-house at their
>     > companies. For
>     >     > > > them
>     >     > > > > a prepared "deck" with ASF branding is fine but others
> might
>     > want to
>     >     > > > > incorporate these slides into their own work (see the
> Legal
>     > thread) and
>     >     > > > > also compose their own out of smaller "components".
>     >     > > > > So for me a good thing would be if we produce smaller
>     > "chapters" of
>     >     > > > things
>     >     > > > > that can then be composed however one would like and to
> make
>     > our
>     >     > > product
>     >     > > > > customizabile (e.g. custom header, footer, background
> colors
>     > etc.)
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > Apache vs. non-Apache // Product vs. non-product
>     >     > > > > I wouldn't want to limit us to Apache products. I don't
> see a
>     > reason
>     >     > > not
>     >     > > > to
>     >     > > > > also talk about 3rd party tools. Especially if they are
> tightly
>     >     > > > integrated
>     >     > > > > into the ecosystem (e.g. the ELK stack is often used
> alongside
>     > Hadoop).
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > +1 I like the idea and it also could make our content
> valuable
>     > to others
>     >     > > > outside the ASF
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > I also don't see a reason to only focus on
>     > <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=%3E+I+also+don't+see+a+reason+to+only+focus+on+&entry=gmail&source=g
> >single
>     > products. A training
>     >     > > > > could focus on "IoT" and cover lots of products.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > +1 this will also give the Apache projects visibility of
> others
>     > in the
>     >     > > > same domain. I'm not really sure how cross pollinated our
>     > projects are.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > In a similar vein it doesn't always have to be technical
>     > products. I've
>     >     > > > > already been approached from multiple people about "The
> Apache
>     > Way"
>     >     > > > > presentations. Now whether they make more sense in
> ComDev is
>     > to be
>     >     > > > decided.
>     >     > > > > Maybe Sharan can weigh in?
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > I think Training would be a great place for managing the
> Apache
>     > Way
>     >     > > > content. In ComDev we've tried to gather and collate this
> type
>     > of content
>     >     > > > and have ended up with a page of different presentation
> slides.
>     > Each
>     >     > > person
>     >     > > > has a different spin on it - so creating something
> standard as a
>     > nice off
>     >     > > > the shelf template that anyone can use will be great. And
> I'm
>     > happy to
>     >     > > > ensure we maintain a link and communicate with ComDev
> regularly
>     > so
>     >     > > > potential contributors know about what we are doing here in
>     > Training.
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > Okay, that's good!
>     >     > > As you said: There's a dozen of those out there now.
>     >     > >
>     >     > > Lars
>     >     > >
>     >     > >
>     >     > > > Thanks
>     >     > > > Sharan
>     >     > > >
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > > > Thanks,
>     >     > > > > Lars
>     >     > > > >
>     >     > > >
>     >     > >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Sönke Liebau
>     >     Partner
>     >     Tel. +49 179 7940878 <+49%20179%207940878>
>     >     OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel -
> Germany
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>
>

Reply via email to