Hi everybody, as mentioned in our current board report I feel like we should revisit the commit and review guidelines [1] that we currently have in place.
I have heard that in at least one instance individuals decided to stop contributing to this project because doing so was overly complicated and regulated - which personally I take as a serious red flag. What do people think, should we move to a commit then review model, for everything, just for content contributions, treat code separately, ... Personally I'd like to at least see some sort of check in place that only content that was actually reviewed makes it into a release. Personally, I feel that commit then review will lead to a large amount of unreviewed content, but if I am the only one that thinks so I am willing to adapt and try something else :) Best regards, Sönke [1] https://training.apache.org/developers/contributing.html#_toc_review_process1
