Lets wait a little for some more people to chime in and then start a vote thread tomorrow if there are no strong objections.
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 13:32, Lars Francke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > But, as I said, while I have concerns I am personally willing to try > > something else - so won't stand in the way of commit then review. > > > > the same is true for me. We briefly discussed this a few months ago. > I'd love to have the time to review everything but I have to admit to > myself that I don't so in order to make more progress we should try > something different. > > I'd be happy to vote +1 for any other proposal. > > Cheers, > Lars > > > > Best regards, > > Sönke > > > > > > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 at 12:55, Christofer Dutz <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Sönke, > > > > > > thanks for bringing this up ... Yes ... don't know if you were > referring > > > to me, but I did really stop contributing, because I thought the > process > > > was getting in the way of getting stuff done. > > > > > > I would suggest to definitely go to "commit then review" for content. > We > > > could consider staying at "review then commit" for the tooling and main > > > theme stuff, as this would affect others more than content does. But I > > > would also opt for going to the simper process in general and perhaps > > > change things if things go south. > > > > > > I think my unreviewed PR that lay dormant for months is a great > > > demonstration of the "review then commit" not working. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 24.01.20, 12:09 schrieb "Sönke Liebau" <[email protected] > > > .INVALID>: > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > as mentioned in our current board report I feel like we should > > revisit > > > the > > > commit and review guidelines [1] that we currently have in place. > > > > > > I have heard that in at least one instance individuals decided to > > stop > > > contributing to this project because doing so was overly > complicated > > > and > > > regulated - which personally I take as a serious red flag. > > > > > > What do people think, should we move to a commit then review model, > > for > > > everything, just for content contributions, treat code separately, > > ... > > > > > > Personally I'd like to at least see some sort of check in place > that > > > only > > > content that was actually reviewed makes it into a release. > > > Personally, I feel that commit then review will lead to a large > > amount > > > of > > > unreviewed content, but if I am the only one that thinks so I am > > > willing to > > > adapt and try something else :) > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Sönke > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://training.apache.org/developers/contributing.html#_toc_review_process1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sönke Liebau > > Partner > > Tel. +49 179 7940878 > > OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany > > > -- Sönke Liebau Partner Tel. +49 179 7940878 OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
